Teams

SPANISH TRAIL #1

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-13vs SPANISH OAKSWon 30
W#1 DoublesValeria Perdomo / Janet Spelman vs Annabel Elliott / Vikki Doak6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBarbie Quinn / Sandie Mainwal-Price vs June Sartini / Shay Momiroff6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatricia Freeman / Jane Casovan vs Vicki Schwartz / Aldema Ridge6-0, 6-0
2021-05-06vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDiane Paull / Valeria Perdomo vs Billi Dunning / Adela Smith7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanet Spelman / Arlene Babbitt vs Debi Marimberga / Jane Hodges6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-29vs DTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandie Mainwal-Price / Diane Paull vs Leslee Collins / Susan Castelli4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNanci Simkin / Barbie Quinn vs Marcela Urcia / Kay Higer6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Freeman / Arlene Babbitt vs Cheryl Weiss / Bonnie Longenecker6-2, 6-3
2021-04-22vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #2Won 20
W#1 DoublesBarbie Quinn / Nanci Simkin vs Karen Thowsen / Susan Sadler6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAra Lee Stimson / Jane Casovan vs Ginger Nakamura / Joan Chevalier6-1, 6-4
2021-04-15vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #1Won 20
W#1 DoublesSandie Mainwal-Price / Diane Paull vs Wacharee Rosenberg / Clairen Peeters6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Casovan / Ara Lee Stimson vs Yae Matsuishi / Rae Ann Yost6-3, 6-0
2021-04-08vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandie Mainwal-Price / Valeria Perdomo vs Judith Kraus / Jackie Seavey6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaria Quintana / Arlene Babbitt vs Blanca Avila / Laurie Lenhart4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Paull / Barbie Quinn vs ELMA DALLAL / Sonya Hillman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-03-25vs DRAGONRIDGE CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Paull / Valeria Perdomo vs Michelle Alber / Karen Cottle1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAra Lee Stimson / Jane Casovan vs Cara McMillin / Cindi Ray5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesArlene Babbitt / Patricia Freeman vs Annette Whiteside / Debbie Hicks6-2, 7-6
2021-03-18vs SPANISH TRAIL #3Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Paull / Sandie Mainwal-Price vs Angela Zobrist / Victoria Nienhuis5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Quintana / Valeria Perdomo vs Kathie Dye / Claudia Hernandez6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesArlene Babbitt / Janet Spelman vs Rio Habbas / Sabine Curtis3-6, 3-6
2021-03-11vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesSandie Mainwal-Price / Diane Paull vs Pamela Rusk / Aida Shirley6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesValeria Perdomo / Maria Quintana vs Cherry Marshall / Cappi Bates7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJanet Spelman / Arlene Babbitt vs Victoria Khelifi / Sheila Stetts6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Sandie Mainwal-Price
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Arlene Babbitt
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Diane Paull
published 3.5
3.15
Nanci Simkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Valeria Perdomo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Janet Spelman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Ara Lee Stimson
published 3
2.83
Barbie Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Jane Casovan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandie Mainwal-Price + Ara Lee Stimson6263% games+5.6% vs expected
Valeria Perdomo + Diane Paull451956% games+5.6% vs expected
Jane Casovan + Ara Lee Stimson9359% games+4.4% vs expected
Valeria Perdomo + Sandie Mainwal-Price11359% games+3.3% vs expected
Diane Paull + Sandie Mainwal-Price432755% games−0.3% vs expected
Arlene Babbitt + Janet Spelman91153% games−1.4% vs expected
Diane Paull + Janet Spelman7358% games−1.5% vs expected
Arlene Babbitt + Sandie Mainwal-Price251853% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandie Mainwal-Price
216W–113L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Arlene Babbitt
180W–158L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Diane Paull
187W–134L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Nanci Simkin
77W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Valeria Perdomo
196W–101L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Janet Spelman
121W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Ara Lee Stimson
90W–94L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Barbie Quinn
91W–107L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Jane Casovan
124W–184L career · 4 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.