Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna

2021 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-10-19vs Park City MARC-Sidford/KernLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Mary Jane Swalberg vs Samantha Levin / Alexis Smith2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke McCloskey / Carolyn Cottle vs Marcela Pomadoro / Mindy Halsey5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Tooley / Jan Watts vs Jessica Schulz / Marcey Goldner4-6, 3-6
2021-10-12vs South Jordan-Simmons/SimmonsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJaNean Nelson / Jan Watts vs Taeeui Ham / Robin Simmons2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Swalberg / Annette Ludlow vs Megan Harbertson / Tiffany Renfro1-6, 3-6
2021-10-05vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Love/MillerLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Brooke McCloskey vs Deanne Goaslind / Jenny DeWaal3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Mary Jane Swalberg vs Tana Coleman / Maria Lombardi2-6, 0-6
2021-09-28vs Sun Pro-Burns/FowkesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Tooley / Jan Watts vs Karen Nielson / Ashley Bailey2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Mary Jane Swalberg vs Cheryl Harker / Linda Fillmore1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJaNean Nelson / Brooke McCloskey vs TRACY PADGETT / Andrea Burns3-6, 3-6
2021-09-21vs Spanish Fork-Westover/BarberLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrooke McCloskey / Karla Block vs Melanie Hall / Choon Whittle0-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Mary Jane Swalberg vs Diane Heaps / Krista Stewart0-6, 0-6
2021-09-14vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Assemi/HandlonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Sorensen / Jan Watts vs Shoeleh Assemi / Janice Stokes-Burns1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Swalberg / Annette Ludlow vs Jennifer Sweat / Lola Andre4-6, 5-7
2021-08-31vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Mary Jane Swalberg vs Shaunee Adams / Mindy Christensen1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJan Watts / Carolyn Cottle vs Marilyn Patch / Elizabeth West6-4, 6-3
2021-08-24vs Park City MARC-Sidford/KernLost 03
L#2 DoublesJan Watts / Mary Sorensen vs Shana Overton / Kristi Johnson2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKarla Block / Brooke McCloskey vs Mindy Halsey / Marcela Pomadoro3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesAnnette Ludlow / Mary Jane Swalberg vs Eileen Coccaro / Darla Cardwell4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Carolyn Cottle
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
JaNean Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.88
Mary Sorensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Annette Ludlow
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Kathrine Wright
published 3
2.48
Mary Jane Swalberg
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.40
Karla Block
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Brooke McCloskey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jan Watts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delia Bayna + JaNean Nelson91050% games+10.1% vs expected
Delia Bayna + Carolyn Cottle4449% games+5.4% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Carolyn Cottle2540% games+1.1% vs expected
Jan Watts + Carolyn Cottle4153% games+0.5% vs expected
Mary Jane Swalberg + Jennifer Tooley5744% games−1.9% vs expected
Brooke McCloskey + Carolyn Cottle0536% games−4.1% vs expected
Karla Block + JaNean Nelson3446% games−4.8% vs expected
Mary Jane Swalberg + Annette Ludlow12426% games−11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Tooley
198W–228L career · 13 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 8 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
JaNean Nelson
116W–137L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
Mary Sorensen
43W–45L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Annette Ludlow
11W–63L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Kathrine Wright
39W–41L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mary Jane Swalberg
75W–203L career · 12 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Karla Block
108W–230L career · type A · 12 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
2.40
Brooke McCloskey
12W–70L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jan Watts
15W–53L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.