Teams

South Jordan-Simmons/Simmons

2021 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-10-19vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsSplit 11
L#3 DoublesTiffany Renfro / Megan Harbertson vs Mindy Christensen / Beverly Robison3-6, 6-7
W#4 DoublesMelissa Despain / Megan Archibald vs Christine Adams / Cecia Croft6-3, 7-6
2021-10-12vs Salt Lake Tennis-BaynaWon 20
W#1 DoublesTaeeui Ham / Robin Simmons vs JaNean Nelson / Jan Watts6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMegan Harbertson / Tiffany Renfro vs Mary Jane Swalberg / Annette Ludlow6-1, 6-3
2021-10-05vs Park City MARC-Sidford/KernSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTaeeui Ham / Megan Archibald vs Terry Sidford / Sue Ann Kern6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMegan Harbertson / Emily Stones vs Shana Overton / Nancy Matz7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-09-28vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Love/MillerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRobin Simmons / Megan Archibald vs Kelly Webster / Malisa Bowen4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesEmily Stones / Megan Harbertson vs Jamie Tate / Bea Jensen6-1, 7-6
2021-09-21vs Sun Pro-Burns/FowkesLost 02
L#2 DoublesKristi Warren / Robin Simmons vs Karen Wilson / Andrea Burns4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesMegan Archibald / Melissa Despain vs Lisa Moncur / Kortney Osborne2-6, 2-6
2021-09-14vs Spanish Fork-Westover/BarberWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Cutler / Robin Simmons vs Kaylene Andrew / Lynette Komiya6-2, 6-3
W#4 DoublesRobin Simmons / Megan Archibald vs Christine Dunn / Shoeleh Assemi6-0, 6-4
2021-08-24vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cutler / Robin Simmons vs Cecia Croft / Jennifer Wells6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sun Pro-Burns/Fowkes7134620246
2CMTA @ Liberty Park-Swenson/Sampson71301025309
3CMTA @ Liberty Park-Love/Miller71281231313
4Park City MARC-Leigh/Epstein62261434322
5South Jordan-Simmons/Simmons53251536322
6RISE AC-Mower/Longson53211944354
7Sun Pro-Parker/Koehle53211945368
8Park City MARC-Sidford/Kern44202044345
9South Jordan-Hall/Phinney44192150385
10Salt Lake Tennis-Cracroft/Moretensen26132757417
11Spanish Fork-Westover/Barber26132758376

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Crystel Fox
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.79
Taeeui Ham
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.75
Kristi Warren
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Melissa Despain
usually #4 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4
3.58
DeeAnn Henderson
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.27
Robin Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Audrey Dufel
published 3.5
Emily Stones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Julie Labrum
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Michelle Cutler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Tiffany Renfro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.78
Karen Rozsa
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
Kristy Simmons
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Megan Archibald
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Megan Harbertson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Renfro + Kristi Warren8160% games+11.9% vs expected
Kristy Simmons + Kristi Warren8361% games+10.1% vs expected
Robin Simmons + Megan Archibald6260% games+5.6% vs expected
Megan Archibald + Melissa Despain9651% games+5.1% vs expected
Michelle Cutler + Robin Simmons421560% games+2.1% vs expected
Robin Simmons + Melissa Despain13954% games+1.5% vs expected
Julie Labrum + Tiffany Renfro161946% games−1.9% vs expected
Emily Stones + Megan Harbertson18755% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystel Fox
151W–135L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Taeeui Ham
95W–40L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
Kristi Warren
249W–137L career · 8 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Melissa Despain
174W–109L career · 7 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
4
DeeAnn Henderson
291W–224L career · 6 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
Robin Simmons
189W–90L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Audrey Dufel
35W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Emily Stones
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Labrum
98W–95L career · 8 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Michelle Cutler
149W–101L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Tiffany Renfro
119W–133L career · 8 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Karen Rozsa
187W–205L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
Kristy Simmons
82W–27L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Megan Archibald
92W–40L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Megan Harbertson
37W–18L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.