Teams

Wolf/40/6.0/MXD/POTC

2023 Shrev-Boss Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Shrev

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Blake Bunnett
published 3.5
3.42
Tim Stuart
published
3.41
Megan Stuermann
published
3.34
Rachael Deere
published
3.25
Karen McCoy
published
3.24
Kim McGuirt
published
3.21
Scott Wolf
published
3.09
Dana Hicks
published 3.5
3.04
Robbie Malone
published
3.04
Nak Choi
published
2.98
Heather Duke
published
2.80
Keith Knox
published
2.78
Amy Stafford
published 3
Greg Watkins
published
Stephanie Jordan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robbie Malone + Dana Hicks213 matchesnot enough data
Robbie Malone + Kim McGuirt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blake Bunnett
37W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Tim Stuart
39W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Megan Stuermann
28W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Rachael Deere
66W–40L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Karen McCoy
33W–28L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Kim McGuirt
25W–30L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Scott Wolf
25W–31L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Dana Hicks
22W–31L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Robbie Malone
12W–27L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Nak Choi
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
Heather Duke
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Keith Knox
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Amy Stafford
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Greg Watkins
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Jordan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.