Teams

LCTA18/Bautista

USTA 18 & Over Tri-Level League · 3.0 3.5 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 3.5 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Annmarie Taggio
published 4
3.56
Kari Roever
published
3.48
Vanessa Hinson
published
3.47
3.47
Valerie Mehta
published
3.11
Ana Bautista
published 3.5
3.05
Kimberleigh Booros
published
2.84
Dana Keys
published 3
2.77
Julia Rehder
published
Meghan Eichelberger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Bautista + Meghan Eichelberger12852% games+1.5% vs expected
Vanessa Hinson + Kari Roever3650% games−2.6% vs expected
Dana Keys + Meghan Eichelberger0530% gamesnot enough data
Claire le Cheminant + Annmarie Taggio134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Keys + Julia Rehder213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annmarie Taggio
77W–71L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Kari Roever
43W–43L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
Vanessa Hinson
33W–71L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Claire le Cheminant
34W–50L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
Valerie Mehta
123W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Ana Bautista
29W–35L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kimberleigh Booros
95W–78L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Dana Keys
59W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.84
Julia Rehder
51W–45L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Meghan Eichelberger
52W–43L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.