Teams

CDTA W 55&OW7.0 9.RCLB Eichner Sun 6 $22

CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W · E

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesDiane Egan / Allison Milmoe vs Janine Stalcup / Marie Hajduk6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLynn Meyer / Laurie Sandman vs Cindy MacDonald / Denise McKenna1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRachel Kaiser / Diane Egan vs Masayo Kobashi / Moon Kaneshiro7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRita Eichner / Laura Munitz Johnson vs Nancy Nora / Kim Vandegrift2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Meyer / Mindey Johnson vs Mishez Avari / Deborah Sonoda6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobin Ford / Allison Milmoe vs Lynn Callahan / Mitzi Kastner6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDiane Egan / Vina Maniquis vs Donna Salvatore / Sarah W Johnson6-0, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Meyer / Lynn Meyer vs Jennifer Cicciu / Anne Lewis6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Ford / Allison Milmoe vs Mandy Shaw / Antje Boeing6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobin Ford / Allison Milmoe vs Deborah Holt / Carol Paddock6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesChristina Greeley / Rachel Kaiser vs Laura Knapp / Irene Salerno4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRosa Broseman / Diane Egan vs Rosemary Swierk / Jeanne Tromp3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $227018310130
2CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $226117415164
3CDTA W 55&OW7.0 9.RCLB Eichner Sun 6 $225215619165
4CDTA W 55&OW7.0 7.STP Howell Sun 1 $223491224185
5CDTA W 55&OW7.0 2.Naper Bianchi Fri 7:30 $243491225191
6CDTA W 55&OW7.0 3.Herit Hanrahan Sat 2 $253471433221
7CDTA W 55&OW7.0 8.Wlmt Ellison Sat 5 $251661532195
8DROPPED W 55&OW7.0 1.MTC Brown Fri 7 $33.5000000
9CDTA W 55&OW7.0 4.Gnbk Edidin Sat 5 $250731836230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Rachel Kaiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Allison Milmoe
published 3.5
3.46
Linda Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Apple Naughton
published 3.5
3.43
Noreen Ohcana
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Sue Christianson
published 3.5
3.39
Christina Greeley
published 3.5
3.38
Diane Egan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Laurie Sandman
published 3.5
3.29
Mindey Johnson
published 3.5
3.29
Rosemary Wheeler
published 3.5
3.28
Robin Ford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Rosa Broseman
published 3.5
3.25
Lynn Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Kimberly Pfahl
published 3.5
3.21
3.21
Vina Maniquis
published 3.5
3.20
Elisa Zusman
published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Polisner
published 3.5
2.66
Tricia Lewis
published
Julie Alexander
published
Rita Eichner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Christianson + Linda Meyer7165% games+18.3% vs expected
Elisa Zusman + Diane Egan5651% games+11.4% vs expected
Elisa Zusman + Laurie Sandman9560% games+10.3% vs expected
Elisa Zusman + Christina Greeley3255% games+10.1% vs expected
Laurie Sandman + Linda Meyer7158% games+9.5% vs expected
Diane Egan + Lisa Polisner11070% games+9.1% vs expected
Mindey Johnson + Linda Meyer211060% games+6.3% vs expected
Rosa Broseman + Robin Ford3447% games+5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Kaiser
45W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Allison Milmoe
113W–46L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Linda Meyer
130W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Apple Naughton
225W–194L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Noreen Ohcana
66W–95L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.43
3.5
Sue Christianson
214W–169L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Christina Greeley
226W–208L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Diane Egan
153W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Laurie Sandman
158W–135L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Mindey Johnson
122W–64L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Rosemary Wheeler
162W–147L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Robin Ford
61W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Rosa Broseman
58W–40L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Lynn Meyer
74W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Kimberly Pfahl
55W–40L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Laura Munitz Johnson
38W–59L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Vina Maniquis
100W–105L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Elisa Zusman
172W–142L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lisa Polisner
67W–42L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Tricia Lewis
41W–81L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Julie Alexander
45W–56L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rita Eichner
87W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.