Teams

CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22

CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W · E

19 players · average NTRP 3.47 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#3 DoublesPaula McKendry / Sang Boon Lee vs Janet Mital / Midge Mountin7-5, 6-4
2026-02-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesSang Boon Lee / Paula McKendry vs Mya Murata / Rita Williams7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $227018310130
2CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Tam Grabow Sun 1 $226117415164
3CDTA W 55&OW7.0 9.RCLB Eichner Sun 6 $225215619165
4CDTA W 55&OW7.0 7.STP Howell Sun 1 $223491224185
5CDTA W 55&OW7.0 2.Naper Bianchi Fri 7:30 $243491225191
6CDTA W 55&OW7.0 3.Herit Hanrahan Sat 2 $253471433221
7CDTA W 55&OW7.0 8.Wlmt Ellison Sat 5 $251661532195
8DROPPED W 55&OW7.0 1.MTC Brown Fri 7 $33.5000000
9CDTA W 55&OW7.0 4.Gnbk Edidin Sat 5 $250731836230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Masako Ueda
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
3.60
Tracy Meyer
published
3.54
Suzanne Losasso
published 3.5
3.53
3.48
Katherine Moll
published 3.5
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
published 3.5
3.42
Kathy Kasiurak
published 3.5
3.38
Irene Salerno
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
3.35
Sang Boon Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Linda Genty
published 3.5
3.30
Rosemary Swierk
published 3.5
3.29
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.27
Paula McKendry
published 3.5
Anne Ryan
published 3.5
3.20
Svetlana Kanev
published 3.5
3.13
Magdalena Galinska
published 3.5
2.96
Modupe Sobo
published 3
Laura Knapp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irene Salerno + Magdalena Galinska7263% games+13.0% vs expected
Kathy Kasiurak + Masako Ueda20161% games+5.6% vs expected
Paula McKendry + Kelly Matthews-Pluta5360% games+3.6% vs expected
Modupe Sobo + Masako Ueda6258% games+3.1% vs expected
Paula McKendry + Linda Genty8453% games+1.8% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Irene Salerno16852% games−0.6% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Masako Ueda14951% games−2.4% vs expected
Kathy Kasiurak + Magdalena Galinska6151% games−6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Masako Ueda
166W–96L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.87
Tracy Meyer
76W–70L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Suzanne Losasso
33W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Maria Lourdes Bandelow
93W–66L career · no lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Katherine Moll
37W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Irene Salerno
77W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Kelly Matthews-Pluta
59W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Sang Boon Lee
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Linda Genty
86W–50L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Rosemary Swierk
70W–29L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Paula McKendry
88W–95L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Ryan
20W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Svetlana Kanev
123W–139L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Magdalena Galinska
96W–116L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Modupe Sobo
46W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Laura Knapp
44W–45L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.