Teams

Me.George18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-11Won 20
W#2 SinglesLauren Fye vs Jennifer Taylor6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSara Mazurak / Ann Skvarcius vs Amanda Porter / Liz Miller6-0, 6-0
2024-05-04vs Me.Everitt18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulianne Rothert / Lily Li vs Melissa Everitt / Devon Siege6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Lauren Fye vs Lola Jefferies / Elizabeth Schuette6-7, 5-7
2024-04-27vs La.King18AWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Marriott / Sara Mazurak vs April Lyon / Susan Hackman6-2, 6-4
2024-04-20vs St.Moritz18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJulianne Rothert / Ann Skvarcius vs Keri Urwin / Katie Percy6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSara Mazurak vs Stacey Giglio2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMerrill Henderson / Lauren Fye vs Kimberlei Gill / Donna Driscoll2-6, 2-6
2024-04-13vs As.McCollum18AWon 20
W#2 SinglesWhitney Leab vs Ashley McCollum6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Karen Hepp vs Tina Stewart / Genevieve Daurity6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-07vs Pa.Hankerson18ASplit 11
L#2 SinglesKaren Hepp vs Paulina Powierza0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Marriott / Sara Mazurak vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / QUEEN HARGROVE6-3, 6-1
2024-03-16vs Mo.Sheets18ALost 12
L#1 SinglesWhitney Leab vs Sarah Donovan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Hepp / Melissa George vs Morgan Sheets / Emily Slater3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Lauren Fye vs Melissa DeLorme / Lindsay Strickland6-4, 6-2
2024-03-16vs Le.Barter18ALost 12
L#1 SinglesSara Mazurak vs Leigh Barter1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa George / Julianne Rothert vs Liz Arcos / Valerie Wallace4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Hepp / Lily Li vs Lauren Redmond / Barbara Wilhelm6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kim Peters
published
3.58
Lauren Fye
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.46
Ann Skvarcius
published 3.5
3.46
Julianne Rothert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Sara Mazurak
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Alison Kalinowski
published 3.5
3.31
Whitney Leab
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Elizabeth Marriott
published 3.5
3.28
Karen Hepp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Melissa George
published
2.79
Connie Haynes
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Mazurak + Lauren Fye12562% games+6.9% vs expected
Connie Haynes + Karen Hepp11263% games+1.7% vs expected
Connie Haynes + Sara Mazurak6457% gamesnot enough data
Connie Haynes + Lauren Fye3253% gamesnot enough data
Melissa George + Whitney Leab033 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Leab + Julianne Rothert213 matchesnot enough data
Julianne Rothert + Lauren Fye303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Fye + Karen Hepp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Peters
23W–22L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Lauren Fye
218W–63L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Ann Skvarcius
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Julianne Rothert
52W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Sara Mazurak
168W–65L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Alison Kalinowski
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Whitney Leab
59W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elizabeth Marriott
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Karen Hepp
174W–98L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
Melissa George
1W–20L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Connie Haynes
147W–79L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.