Teams

NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Barden/Brown-Launchpad

2024 NWO Mixed 40 & Over · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-03vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Keating-TWOSLost 02
L#1 DoublesLuis Salas / Denise Sottek vs Mike O'Reilly / Sara Theis0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Connelly Jr / Sara Stacy vs James Kaczorowski / Cassie Hartzell1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesWilliam Connelly Jr / Sara Stacy vs James Allen / Patricia Naus1-6, 2-6
2024-02-18vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Stiles-TWOSLost 03
L#1 DoublesClaire Brown / Sara Stacy vs Drew Stiles / Brice Starner2-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesDaniel Barden / Melissa Dykhuis vs Theresa Vietmeier / Mike Williams3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany Burnett / Luis Salas vs Gilbert Rangel Jr / Staci Freeworth6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDenise Sottek / Luis Salas vs Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar / Darin Freeman6-7, 1-4
L#2 DoublesDaniel Barden / Brandi Walerius vs Janet Daniel / Jeff Renner0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSara Stacy / Claire Brown vs Jill Gauthier / Mike Kapuscinski3-6, 5-6
2024-01-28vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver PTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLuis Salas / Melissa Dykhuis vs Mary Jo French / Tom Miller4-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesDaniel Barden / Denise Sottek vs Jay Jones / Ani Gonzales3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Connelly Jr / Sara Stacy vs Jill Feltner / Gabriel Feltner2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesClaire Brown / Melissa Dykhuis vs Darius Zolnor / Marcie Cousino6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Connelly Jr / Sara Stacy vs William Rachwal / Ann Marie Rachwal3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Barden / Brittany Burnett vs David Fisher / Josie Kimaid4-6, 5-3, 0-1
2024-01-14vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs -SVCLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Connelly Jr / Sara Stacy vs James Jacobs / Laura Nejedlik2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Brown / Denise Sottek vs Jordan Rofkar / Noline Srougi4-6, 2-5
L#3 DoublesBrittany Burnett / Daniel Barden vs Kevin Green / Lisa Evans1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesClaire Brown / Denise Sottek vs Randy Kim / Nicole Banker3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLuis Salas / Brandi Walerius vs SCOTT BOURBEAU / Joanna Lewinski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrittany Burnett / Daniel Barden vs Luke King / Mindy Kairis7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs -SVC8021310160
2NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist7118618174
3NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Kapuscinski-SVC62141020187
4NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Keating-TWOS5315921166
5NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver PTC44141022186
6NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Stiles-TWOS2691530214
7NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Cody/Banker-TWOS2681634238
8NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Barden/Brown-Launchpad2642042265
9NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Pilewski- SVC0851942255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Melissa Dykhuis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Brittany Burnett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Denise Sottek
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Claire Brown
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Brandi Walerius
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Luis Salas
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.94
Daniel Barden
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published 3
2.50
Sara Stacy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
William Connelly Jr
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Connelly Jr + Sara Stacy1429% gamesnot enough data
Brittany Burnett + Daniel Barden134 matchesnot enough data
Brandi Walerius + Daniel Barden224 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Barden + Denise Sottek134 matchesnot enough data
Claire Brown + Sara Stacy044 matchesnot enough data
Luis Salas + Denise Sottek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Dykhuis
76W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.57
3.5
Brittany Burnett
90W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Denise Sottek
112W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Claire Brown
47W–45L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brandi Walerius
95W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Luis Salas
41W–40L career · 7 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Daniel Barden
60W–90L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Sara Stacy
43W–86L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%50%50%
2.50
William Connelly Jr
58W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.