Teams

NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Cody/Banker-TWOS

2024 NWO Mixed 40 & Over · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesKim Sofo / Luke King vs Janet Daniel / Darin Freeman3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Cody / Chad Cody vs Mike Kapuscinski / Jill Gauthier7-5, 4-3
L#3 DoublesJoanna Lewinski / SCOTT BOURBEAU vs Jeff Renner / Chahnaz Almadfae Haidar5-7, 0-4
2024-02-25vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver PTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicole Banker / Randy Kim vs Mary Jo French / Rod Bowe1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWade Banker / Mindy Kairis vs Lyndsey Lucas / Gabriel Feltner0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesNancy Malcuit / Luke King vs Jon Welker / Hope Modlin7-6, 3-1
W#2 DoublesKim Sofo / Chad Cody vs Josie Kimaid / Jim Pilewski6-4, 2-5, 1-0
2024-02-11vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs -SVCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Cody / Chad Cody vs Lisa Evans / Matthew Haschak2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSCOTT BOURBEAU / Joanna Lewinski vs Angela Horn / James Jacobs1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Banker / Wade Banker vs Noline Srougi / Jordan Rofkar1-6, 1-6
2024-01-28vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Keating-TWOSLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuke King / Nancy Malcuit vs Brian Cromly / Renee Kreft3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Cody / Chad Cody vs Jacob Zinz / Hallie Williams6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSCOTT BOURBEAU / Joanna Lewinski vs Kristopher Keating / Didi Thomason2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesRandy Kim / Nicole Banker vs Daniel Klein / Lisa Baer-Dewhirst7-5, 1-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLuke King / Kelly Cody vs Matt Damschroder / Milena Mrdjenovic2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMindy Kairis / Wade Banker vs Jason Johnson / Debra Bloomquist0-6, 1-6
2024-01-14vs NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Stiles-TWOSWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Banker / Randy Kim vs Tracy Tyo / Ken Gottschalk6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSCOTT BOURBEAU / Joanna Lewinski vs Jennifer Morgan / Greg Davis3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMindy Kairis / Luke King vs Theresa Vietmeier / Jamie Meyers1-6, 3-4
W#1 DoublesRandy Kim / Nicole Banker vs Claire Brown / Denise Sottek6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSCOTT BOURBEAU / Joanna Lewinski vs Luis Salas / Brandi Walerius3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLuke King / Mindy Kairis vs Brittany Burnett / Daniel Barden5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NWO Mixed 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Jacobs -SVC8021310160
2NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist7118618174
3NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Kapuscinski-SVC62141020187
4NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Keating-TWOS5315921166
5NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Traver PTC44141022186
6NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Stiles-TWOS2691530214
7NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Cody/Banker-TWOS2681634238
8NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Barden/Brown-Launchpad2642042265
9NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Pilewski- SVC0851942255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Randy Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Chad Cody
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.29
SCOTT BOURBEAU
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.26
Nicole Banker
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
3.20
Kim Sofo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Joanna Lewinski
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.79
Nancy Malcuit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Mindy Kairis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kelly Cody
published
Luke King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Wade Banker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SCOTT BOURBEAU + Joanna Lewinski101350% games+10.5% vs expected
Chad Cody + Nicole Banker4351% games+5.5% vs expected
Nicole Banker + Wade Banker31141% games+3.3% vs expected
Randy Kim + Nicole Banker3253% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Malcuit + Luke King1442% gamesnot enough data
Mindy Kairis + Luke King044 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Malcuit + SCOTT BOURBEAU123 matchesnot enough data
Mindy Kairis + Chad Cody303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Randy Kim
213W–135L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.75
3.5
Chad Cody
90W–92L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
SCOTT BOURBEAU
111W–67L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
Nicole Banker
118W–92L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Kim Sofo
75W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Joanna Lewinski
74W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
Nancy Malcuit
26W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Mindy Kairis
50W–94L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Kelly Cody
26W–43L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Luke King
24W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wade Banker
23W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.