Teams

Me.Everitt18T3.5

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-07-19vs Ki.Patrey18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesZana Piric / Susan Paeplow vs Juliane Huguely / Susan Fanelly1-6, 2-6
2023-07-15vs Ly.Manweiler18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesHilary Tew / Lan Bello vs Karen McKee / Suellen Bailey3-6, 5-7
2023-07-12vs Ki.Patrey18TLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Zana Piric vs Jane Williams / Allison Graves7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Ravenscraft / Sheila Riley vs Nancy Pack / Ella Schwochert7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelissa Everitt / Lan Bello vs Deb Lanier / Nicole Peterson4-6, 0-6
2023-07-11vs Sa.Burks Schmalz18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Littleton / Lan Bello vs Suellen Bailey / Lisa ONeill3-6, 3-6
2023-07-08vs Da.Haney18TWon 10
W#1 DoublesZana Piric / Erin McAllister vs Cary Brege / Liz Broadway6-2, 6-3
2023-07-08vs Ly.Manweiler18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesLan Bello / Julie Dougherty vs Marti May / Karen McKee1-6, 5-7
2023-06-28vs Ki.Patrey18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Sprague / Zana Piric vs Allison Graves / Leah Weinberger3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLan Bello / Camille Gibbs vs Emily Childs / Kathryn Stone7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-21vs Ki.Patrey18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Jennifer Ravenscraft vs Juliane Huguely / Susan Fanelly1-6, 2-6
2023-06-10vs Sa.Burks Schmalz18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Dougherty / Lan Bello vs Marti May / Lisa ONeill3-6, 3-6
2023-06-03vs Da.Haney18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Rendon / Zana Piric vs Dara Haney / Cary Brege3-6, 3-6
2023-05-31vs Ki.Patrey18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesZana Piric / Susan Paeplow vs Susan Fanelly / Laura McNiven7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLan Bello / Laura Rendon vs Emily Childs / Leah Weinberger1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Erin McAllister
published 4
3.75
Jennifer Ravenscraft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Janet Sprague
published
3.68
Mary Money
published 4
3.62
Susan Paeplow
published
3.44
Donna Wells
published 4
3.34
Sheila Riley
published
3.31
Zana Piric
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Melissa House
published
3.24
Laurie Parker
published
3.08
Camille Gibbs
published 3.5
3.08
Lan Bello
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zana Piric + Lan Bello1537% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Riley + Erin McAllister123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin McAllister
26W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Jennifer Ravenscraft
32W–25L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
Janet Sprague
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Mary Money
196W–130L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Susan Paeplow
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Donna Wells
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44
Sheila Riley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
Melissa House
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Laurie Parker
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Camille Gibbs
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Lan Bello
73W–72L career · 7 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Laura Rendon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.