Teams

SoCal/Hicks/40&Over3.5W

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-02vs OC NBTC - Elaiza - 10Won 10
W#1 SinglesGretchen Cuzick vs Allegra Fulcher6-1, 6-3
2025-03-28vs OC Mesa Verde CC - Julie 930Won 10
W#1 SinglesTricia Bregman vs Reiko Kurakazu6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGretchen Cuzick vs CHRISTY PARENTE7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJill Brown / Gretchen Cuzick vs Renee Beckloff / Lois Russell6-2, 7-5
2025-02-21vs OC Marguerite MVTC - Caroline 1030Split 11
W#1 SinglesTricia Bregman vs Michelle Levene6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGretchen Cuzick / Jill Brown vs Laura Anderson / Jenny Thurrell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-11vs OC Coto De Caza - 830Split 11
L#1 SinglesTricia Bregman vs Rachel McPheron2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGretchen Cuzick / Jill Brown vs Maria Valera / Fiorella Villar7-6, 6-1
2025-01-17vs OC Mission Viejo CC -Janna/ JessicaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTricia Bregman vs Janna Canzone6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Hicks / Gretchen Cuzick vs Carrie Anderson / Diane Miller3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Stacey Choi
published
3.66
Monica Anderson
published
3.58
Michelle Boothroyd
published
3.57
Melanie Irwin
published
3.54
Hayley Dobbins
published 4
3.53
Gretchen Cuzick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Christy Dozor
published 4
3.39
Tricia Bregman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Karla Padova
published
3.34
Tammy Vuong
published
3.32
Janice Lee Wang
published
3.32
Kelly Huarte
published
3.30
Adrianne de Castro
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayley Dobbins + Melanie Irwin8649% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Choi
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
Monica Anderson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Michelle Boothroyd
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Melanie Irwin
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Hayley Dobbins
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Gretchen Cuzick
133W–84L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Christy Dozor
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Tricia Bregman
114W–117L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Karla Padova
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
Tammy Vuong
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
Janice Lee Wang
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Kelly Huarte
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Adrianne de Castro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.