Teams

MAC Staton

2021 Richmond Working Women · Working Women 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-07Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesMichelle Jepson / Clarissa McDonough vs Linda Harrell / Cathy McLennan6-1, 6-2
2021-05-24vs Hermitage HardestyLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesCarolyn Martin / Susan Staton vs Kirsten Knull / Monica Walsh5-7, 1-6
2021-05-17vs Woodlake MorrisonSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesCheri McLeod / Susan Staton vs Stacey Cabral / Laura Brawley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 Female DoublesMichelle Jepson / Clarissa McDonough vs Irene Shepherd / Julia Morrison6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-26vs Raintree FosterSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesMichelle Jepson / Carolyn Martin vs Pam Koch / Eliza Causey3-6, 1-6
W#2 Female DoublesCheri McLeod / Susan Staton vs Molly Smith / Truitt Allcott6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-23Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCheri McLeod / Susan Staton vs Elizabeth Keith / Ashley Sommardahl2-6, 3-6
2021-04-12vs Kings Charter ThummaWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesMichelle Jepson / Carolyn Martin vs Tracy Surratt / Rebecca Cassilly6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Working Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Michelle Jepson
usually #2 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Cheri McLeod
published 3.5
2.92
Susan Staton
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Anne Wolff
published 3
2.77
Sue Mathe
published
2.77
Chitra Chavan
published 3
2.77
2.65
Susanna Dodd
published
2.63
Ruth Bates
published
2.43
Melinda Staples
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Staton + Anne Wolff3450% games+0.3% vs expected
Susan Staton + Michelle Jepson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Jepson
130W–103L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Cheri McLeod
4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
2.96
Susan Staton
132W–142L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Anne Wolff
23W–33L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
Sue Mathe
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Chitra Chavan
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Clarissa McDonough
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Susanna Dodd
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
Ruth Bates
7W–21L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
2.63
Melinda Staples
17W–21L career · no lines in 2021
0%70%30%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.