Teams

Shenanigans

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.06 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-05-04vs Net NinjasLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Yost / Wendy Lahmon vs Dyan Goulet / Julie McDonald4-6, 3-6
2022-04-11vs Nice AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Cannon / Wendy Lahmon vs Patricia Aarestad / Anke Heineck6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Gracie Franks
published 3.5
3.04
KATIE RATLIFF
published 3
2.81
Carol Mills
published 3
2.72
Heidi Friend
published 3
2.70
Christine Cannon
published 3
2.69
ADRA KIPPER
published 3
2.68
Anna Arrants
published 3
2.67
Suzanne Hickok
published 3
2.64
Jill Yost
published
Karen Sheehan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Patricia Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Robin Toney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Keller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Wendy Lahmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Friend + Suzanne Hickok1538% games+1.0% vs expected
ADRA KIPPER + Jill Yost62239% games−8.7% vs expected
Carol Mills + Suzanne Hickok61242% games−8.8% vs expected
Robin Toney + Gracie Franks826853% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Friend + Karen Sheehan323646% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Wendy Lahmon63038% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Robin Toney121648% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Patricia Hoffman121648% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gracie Franks
74W–91L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
KATIE RATLIFF
127W–121L career · no lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Carol Mills
71W–81L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Heidi Friend
101W–130L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Christine Cannon
82W–136L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
ADRA KIPPER
45W–103L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Anna Arrants
46W–94L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Suzanne Hickok
75W–124L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
2.67
Jill Yost
52W–129L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Karen Sheehan
77W–84L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Hoffman
114W–123L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Toney
88W–79L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Keller
54W–55L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Lahmon
19W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.