Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · Women's 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Edlira Muratas
published 3.5
3.30
Annika Fischer
published 3.5
3.05
Jessica Thornton
published
2.94
Kristen Kincaid
published
2.92
Celia Welch
published 3
2.91
Sharon Wippern
published
2.87
Kristi Kaiser
published
2.87
Megan de la O
published
2.79
Colleen Winters
published 3
2.79
Lisa Aldrich
published
Colette Gell
published 3
2.71
Lara Abbott
published
2.69
Lindy Bouwer
published
2.49
Julie Fifield
published
2.46
Diane de Seve
published 2.5
Katherine Gordon
published
Leslee Fowler
published
Margaret Angelovich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Winters + Celia Welch4261% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Wippern + Julie Fifield044 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Kincaid + Sharon Wippern303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Edlira Muratas
12W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Annika Fischer
12W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Jessica Thornton
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
Kristen Kincaid
15W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Celia Welch
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Sharon Wippern
16W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
2.91
Kristi Kaiser
10W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
2.87
Megan de la O
33W–32L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Colleen Winters
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.79
Lisa Aldrich
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Colette Gell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lara Abbott
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Lindy Bouwer
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Julie Fifield
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Diane de Seve
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
0%61%39%
2.46
Katherine Gordon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Leslee Fowler
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret Angelovich
10W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.