← Teams

GLVR-Kopack

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
JENNIFER BELOY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Kristen Kopack
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
May Albano
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Danielle Cuenco
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Carrie Putsch
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Jerilyn Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Tina Farrelly
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.57
Marie Picard
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.53
Jennifer Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Melissa Light
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Sarah Carrato
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Gina Ossanna
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Schwarz
published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-06-11Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMay Albano / Danielle Cuenco vs Traci Harris / Angie Lee6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Simmons / Jerilyn Hanson vs Karen Dellinger / Kelly Mohr6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKEELEY PLOMBON / Tina Farrelly vs Chizuru Watanabe / Kyoko Adcock6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKristen Kopack / JENNIFER BELOY vs Shannon Bilstrom / Amy Wang7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMay Albano / Danielle Cuenco vs Geraldine Carter / Laura Luthi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Farrelly / Carrie Putsch vs Catherine Go / Kim Stevens6-2, 6-1
2023-05-21Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesSarah Carrato / Jennifer Simmons vs Kaelin Teo / Molly Shum7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Light / Marie Picard vs Sharon Kim-Geib / Susan Ford6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHolly Kanz / Danielle Cuenco vs Molly Odonnell / Laura Rundle6-3, 7-5
2023-05-06Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJENNIFER BELOY / Jerilyn Hanson vs Claire Thayer / Rebecca Jones2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Kopack / May Albano vs Linda Barr / Kate Leatherbarrow3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-04-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJENNIFER BELOY / Marie Picard vs Lynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Putsch / Kristen Kopack vs Elizabeth Domagalski / Shamera Daugherty6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMay Albano / Tina Farrelly vs Kris Kelly-Koster / Emily McBride6-3, 6-2
2023-04-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTina Farrelly / Carrie Putsch vs Susan Agee / Cindy Rushall6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristen Kopack / Jennifer Simmons vs Hong Allen / Lisa Provost6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMelissa Light / Marie Picard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMay Albano / JENNIFER BELOY vs Cassia Carpio / Angie Lee4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJerilyn Hanson / Jennifer Simmons vs Kelly Mohr / Rie Sasakawa6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Carrato / Holly Kanz vs Donna Kennish / Takumi Koyama6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2023-04-08Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesJennifer Simmons / Kristen Kopack vs Michelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesCarrie Putsch vs Mary Hlady6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Carrato / Holly Kanz vs Babette Zielinski / Toni Kidd7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMay Albano / Tina Farrelly vs Susan Branam / Linda Graham6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
JENNIFER BELOY
100W–45L career
0%99%1%
3.79
4
Kristen Kopack
70W–45L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
May Albano
62W–52L career
1%99%1%
3.77
4
Danielle Cuenco
89W–56L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Carrie Putsch
62W–49L career
2%98%0%
3.73
4
Jerilyn Hanson
12W–27L career · type A
14%85%1%
3.66
4
Tina Farrelly
115W–45L career
14%86%0%
3.58
4
Marie Picard
128W–96L career
18%82%0%
3.57
4
Jennifer Simmons
63W–75L career
28%72%0%
3.53
4
Melissa Light
38W–69L career
32%68%0%
3.52
4
Sarah Carrato
77W–66L career
55%45%0%
3.42
3.5
Gina Ossanna
33W–61L career
0%92%7%
3.37
3.5
Elizabeth Schwarz
49W–46L career
17%83%0%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.