Teams

NITA W 80MX40c Glenbrook RC (Aguayo)

2022 NITA2 Winter Mixed 40 & Over · NITA Winter 40 & Over 8.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-29vs NITA W 80MX40a TAM (Marberry/Sung)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Rick Aguayo vs Sara Marberry / Bruce Thornquist6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNoreen Ohcana / Rafael Lozada vs Silvia Kusaka / John Bhatty2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesChristine Meade / John Leubner vs Deborah Marshall / Damian Marshall6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Nemec / Rick Aguayo vs Ngozi Ezike / Alfred Ramirez6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSophia Koliatsis / Bill Bowman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Rick Aguayo vs Ayako Butolph / Pierre Thavong6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSophia Koliatsis / Bill Bowman vs Elena Kovalenko / John Pero6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesRick Aguayo / Christine Meade vs Angie Ulie / David Kahley6-7, 3-4
W#2 DoublesRafael Lozada / Jennifer Nemec vs Brian Cole / Ellen Elliot7-5, 6-3
2022-01-22vs NITA W 80MX40a TAM (Marberry/Sung)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRick Aguayo / Dawn Baumann vs Bruce Thornquist / Lesley Seeger5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWerner Camoras / Elisa Boyd vs Brian Atad / Huan Chang7-6, 5-2
L#1 DoublesElisa Boyd / Werner Camoras vs Rich Katzmann / Vicki Mitchell2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNoreen Ohcana / Rafael Lozada vs Melissa Held / Deniz Karacay4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NITA Winter 40 & Over 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 80MX40d Naperville TC (Podwika)6220410161
2NITA W 80MX40a TAM (Marberry/Sung)44121228220
3NITA W 80MX40e Vaughan AC (Lathan/Elliot)44111328223
4NITA W 80MX40c Glenbrook RC (Aguayo)3591533237
5NITA W 80MX40b Hinsdale RC (Marshall/Marshall)3581634238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Bill Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Christine Meade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Rafael Lozada
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.98
Russell Needler
published 4.5
3.95
Dawn Baumann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
John Leubner
published
3.75
Sophia Koliatsis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Rick Aguayo
published
3.57
Jennifer Nemec
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Noreen Ohcana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elisa Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Pamela Young
published
Werner Camoras
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Meade + Bill Bowman6160% gamesnot enough data
Russell Needler + Sophia Koliatsis303 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Baumann + Rafael Lozada213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bill Bowman
216W–101L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%23%77%
4.59
4.5
Christine Meade
279W–180L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Rafael Lozada
223W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
4.5
Russell Needler
93W–105L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
John Leubner
104W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Sophia Koliatsis
341W–195L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Rick Aguayo
124W–85L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Jennifer Nemec
62W–168L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Noreen Ohcana
66W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.43
3.5
Elisa Boyd
23W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Young
32W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Werner Camoras
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.