Teams

2-HRoss-Eno

Tri-Level-18 & Over · 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 Women Weekend

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2023-07-29vs 4-JRoss-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesRachel Davis / Kim El vs Nannette Goodwin / Neeta Vora6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrook Holton Sheahan / Roberta Hadley vs Miho Ogura / Tammy Bradley6-3, 6-2
2023-07-29vs 1-MPaul-Eno-Tri-LevelWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrook Holton Sheahan / Mary Jo Dunnington vs Elyssa Millard / Katie Masood6-3, 6-1
2023-07-22vs 5-AArgersinger-HVCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Fuller / Brook Holton Sheahan vs Alana Argersinger / Amanda Lacoff6-1, 6-2
2023-07-15vs 1-MPaul-Eno-Tri-LevelWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim El / Allison Ostrander vs Elizabeth Harvie / Madison Paul6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmber Cagle / Karen Scherr vs Sneha Mahesh / Wendy Lindberg6-0, 6-2
2023-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Weinberger / Anna Tomkins vs Oxana Gorbacheva / Jane Williams6-1, 6-4
2023-07-01vs 3-TLangino-SVCWon 30
W#1 DoublesZoe Dubrow / Kim El vs Christine Lee / Erika Linnander7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Heald / Anna Tomkins vs Suyeon Kim / Tiffany Langino6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Fuller / Roberta Hadley vs Caroline Patzer / Stacy Brehm6-3, 6-2
2023-07-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Weinberger / Brook Holton Sheahan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-25vs 4-JRoss-EnoWon 21
W#1 DoublesZoe Dubrow / Elaine Schnabel vs Ana Plachco / Elizabeth Copeland6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Heald / Anna Tomkins vs Betsy Shane / Justyne Ross6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRoberta Hadley / Karen Scherr vs Miho Ogura / Button Hall4-6, 5-7
2023-06-24Split 11
W#1 DoublesLynn Tomkins / Anna Tomkins vs Emily Berman / Cindy Sapienza6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrook Holton Sheahan / Cindy Bohlin vs Heather Herndon / Andy Blackburn2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-11vs 1-MPaul-Eno-Tri-LevelWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim El / Anna Tomkins vs Spenser Radtke / Elizabeth Harvie6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Cagle / Brook Holton Sheahan vs Donna Holtaway / Katie Masood6-3, 6-3
2023-06-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Lynn Tomkins vs Randy Smith / Cristina Smith6-2, 6-2
2023-06-10vs 4-JRoss-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynn Tomkins / Anna Tomkins vs Miho Ogura / Jenni Mitchell7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Brook Holton Sheahan vs Sheza Healey / Alison Kalinowski6-1, 6-0
2023-06-04vs 5-AArgersinger-HVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Ostrander / Elaine Schnabel vs Mollie Williams / Stacey Burkert7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Heald / Anna Tomkins vs Emily Howell / Meredith Howell6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmber Cagle / Roberta Hadley vs Jane Waters / Caroline Hamilton6-1, 7-6
2023-05-25vs 3-TLangino-SVCWon 20
W#1 DoublesZoe Dubrow / Allison Ostrander vs Christine Lee / Erika Linnander6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristen Fuller / Roberta Hadley vs Caroline Patzer / Stacy Brehm6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Zoe Dubrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Anna Tomkins
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.12
Allison Ostrander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Elaine Schnabel
published
3.89
Kim El
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Brook Holton Sheahan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.73
Elizabeth Heald
published
3.72
Karen Scherr
published
3.69
Amber Cagle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Meghan Howard
published
3.68
Michelle Then
published
3.64
Heidi Ross
published
3.39
Roberta Hadley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim El + Zoe Dubrow6549% gamesnot enough data
Allison Ostrander + Kim El4252% gamesnot enough data
Roberta Hadley + Anna Tomkins6079% gamesnot enough data
Allison Ostrander + Zoe Dubrow404 matchesnot enough data
Kim El + Anna Tomkins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Zoe Dubrow
101W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 8 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Allison Ostrander
301W–150L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
4.12
Elaine Schnabel
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Kim El
154W–96L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Brook Holton Sheahan
217W–130L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.87
Elizabeth Heald
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Karen Scherr
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Amber Cagle
214W–100L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Meghan Howard
29W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Michelle Then
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Heidi Ross
33W–25L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Roberta Hadley
245W–120L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.