Teams

LCTA39/Berry/Park West

2022 LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-10-27vs LCTA40/Karika/LegendOaksWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenny Biggs / Iliana Bleau vs Tammy Karika / Renee Carl7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kristin Berry
published
3.36
Nicola Swanson
published
3.30
Lauri Steeland
published
3.28
Iliana Bleau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Christine Tunick
published 3.5
3.23
Kimberly Ring
published
3.17
Erika Colbrunn
published 3.5
Cynthia Miller
published 3
2.68
Lisa Nee
published
2.68
Cindy Newman
published 3
2.57
Lynden Pelbath
published
Jenny Biggs
published
Lynda Hamilton
published
Staci Rokette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Colbrunn + Nicola Swanson5067% games+8.8% vs expected
Erika Colbrunn + Christine Tunick9555% games+5.2% vs expected
Christine Tunick + Nicola Swanson291158% games+0.7% vs expected
Kimberly Ring + Lynda Hamilton5254% games−0.2% vs expected
Cindy Newman + Cynthia Miller7851% games−0.6% vs expected
Kimberly Ring + Christine Tunick7354% games−1.1% vs expected
Staci Rokette + Cynthia Miller8751% games−1.9% vs expected
Erika Colbrunn + Lynda Hamilton1445% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Berry
71W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
Nicola Swanson
69W–38L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lauri Steeland
41W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Iliana Bleau
109W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Christine Tunick
86W–54L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Kimberly Ring
56W–34L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Erika Colbrunn
54W–52L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Cynthia Miller
41W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Nee
51W–56L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Cindy Newman
31W–40L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Lynden Pelbath
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Jenny Biggs
44W–52L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynda Hamilton
24W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Staci Rokette
29W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.