Teams

Brake

2024 TRI-LEVEL - POCATELLO · Men's 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-27vs HansenWon 10
W#1 DoublesBryson Smith / Steven Nielsen vs Barry Smith / Russell Ward6-4, 6-4
2024-08-21vs HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Bitton / Bryson Smith vs Barry Smith / Daniel Spicer2-6, 2-6
2024-08-15vs HansenWon 10
W#1 DoublesBryson Smith / Steven Nielsen vs Thaddeus Hansen / Daniel Spicer6-3, 7-6
2024-08-06vs HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesNoah Wang / Steven Nielsen vs Thaddeus Hansen / Barry Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-29vs HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesBryson Smith / Steven Nielsen vs Barry Smith / Daniel Spicer6-7, 4-6
2024-07-24vs HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesBryson Smith / Steven Nielsen vs Barry Smith / Daniel Spicer3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Steven Nielsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Bryson Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Zac Gershberg
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.79
Noah Wang
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Richard Bitton
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
David Brake
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.35
Nathan Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.35
Joshua Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Brake + Nathan Richardson2546% games+6.5% vs expected
Zac Gershberg + Nathan Richardson5253% games+4.5% vs expected
Joshua Ellis + Nathan Richardson151150% games+4.2% vs expected
Joshua Ellis + Zac Gershberg8452% games+3.8% vs expected
David Brake + Richard Bitton3455% gamesnot enough data
Bryson Smith + Steven Nielsen3251% gamesnot enough data
Noah Wang + Richard Bitton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Steven Nielsen
134W–91L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Bryson Smith
39W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Zac Gershberg
158W–72L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Noah Wang
78W–52L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Richard Bitton
90W–44L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
David Brake
257W–175L career · 11 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
3.5
Nathan Richardson
131W–138L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Joshua Ellis
217W–217L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.