Teams

Je.Tyndall18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-30vs He.Suke18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKelly Nels vs Haley Davies6-3, 7-6
2025-07-28vs Su.Potter18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Kelly Thompson6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMolly Chaffee vs Kari Marotta6-3, 6-2
2025-07-21Won 10
W#2 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Kylie Graham6-3, 6-2
2025-07-07vs Em.Andino18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesErin Reis vs Sheri Peck6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMolly Chaffee vs Lisa Pakela6-3, 6-3
2025-06-30vs Me.McCaskill18SWon 21
L#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Austin Coley5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesErin Reis vs Scottie Littlewood6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKelly Nels vs Bess Pitt6-0, 6-4
2025-06-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesSarah Ammirati vs Amy Willard6-4, 6-4
2025-06-22vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Azariah Bell6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKelly Nels vs Tiffany Scotton6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMolly Chaffee vs Barbara Williams4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-09vs Ja.Stephan18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesErin Reis vs Jennifer Lasater0-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs An.Acharya18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesROBIN STEWART vs Lauren Kane6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesSarah Ammirati vs Hollyanne Compton1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Kelly Nels
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.67
Molly Chaffee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.61
Erin Reis
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.60
Jessica Tyndall
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 2.5
2.60
ROBIN STEWART
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.18
Sarah Ammirati
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Chaffee + Erin Reis12754% games+0.5% vs expected
Jessica Tyndall + Kelly Nels4255% gamesnot enough data
Erin Reis + Kelly Nels5068% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Tyndall + Erin Reis134 matchesnot enough data
ROBIN STEWART + Jessica Tyndall213 matchesnot enough data
ROBIN STEWART + Molly Chaffee303 matchesnot enough data
Molly Chaffee + Kelly Nels213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Kelly Nels
69W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.77
3
Carrie Martinelli
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Molly Chaffee
68W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.67
2.5
Erin Reis
52W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.61
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
49W–70L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.60
ROBIN STEWART
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Sarah Ammirati
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.