Teams

18 DeuceBags

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 3.59 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-06-18vs TennisciousSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEric Hallingstad / JAYDIP GUHA vs Thomas Carr / Chris Culig6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRoger Hawkins / Michael Davin Hanson vs Mike Willits / Steven Garcia5-7, 5-7
2024-05-21vs TennisciousLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Huhn / Michael Davin Hanson vs Dit Dudley / Steven Garcia7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Eric Hallingstad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.64
Jacob Wingerd
published 4
3.64
JAYDIP GUHA
published 4
3.54
Andrew Bidou
published 3.5
3.52
Jason Steele
published 3.5
3.45
Jae Yu
published 3.5
3.44
Jeff Huhn
published 3.5
3.39
James Mertz
published 3.5
3.35
Robert Small
published
3.33
Michael Warwick
published 3.5
3.30
Michael Davin Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
David Massie
published 3.5
3.18
Andy Mehl
published 3.5
Drew McMains
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roger Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Bidou + Andy Mehl4552% games+1.8% vs expected
Andy Mehl + Michael Warwick11853% games+0.6% vs expected
Andrew Bidou + James Mertz13461% games−2.7% vs expected
Andy Mehl + Jae Yu3348% games−3.3% vs expected
James Mertz + Jeff Huhn6749% games−5.6% vs expected
James Mertz + Michael Davin Hanson11458% gamesnot enough data
Michael Warwick + Robert Small5642% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Bidou + Eric Hallingstad8163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eric Hallingstad
145W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.65
4
Jacob Wingerd
92W–71L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
4
JAYDIP GUHA
151W–106L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Andrew Bidou
106W–61L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Jason Steele
134W–112L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Jae Yu
156W–95L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Jeff Huhn
89W–49L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
James Mertz
187W–123L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Robert Small
76W–82L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Michael Warwick
108W–120L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Michael Davin Hanson
39W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
David Massie
90W–119L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andy Mehl
176W–175L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
Drew McMains
49W–24L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roger Hawkins
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.