Teams

Dobbins/Borthwick- Get a Grip 18+ W23

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#2 DoublesStacy Chillscyzn / Ruth Eliason vs Alexandra Hilst / Lina Wang4-6, 2-6
2023-03-06vs Wernet 18+ W23Won 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Dobbins / Ruth Eliason vs Angel Nasrabadi / Alla Epshteyn6-2, 6-1
2023-02-13vs ALLEX 3.5 18+ W23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRuth Eliason / Mary Kennedy vs Sara Ormseth / Barb Brown4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRuth Eliason / Ellen Dobbins vs Elise Bonin / Emily Arndt6-2, 6-1
2023-01-23vs Hurd/Harris 18+ W23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCory Borthwick / Ruth Eliason vs Jacie Hurd / Sarah LeDoux4-6, 3-6
2023-01-16vs Hobbs/Nauman 18+ W23Won 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Dobbins / Ruth Eliason vs Kerry Norgaard / Janet Nauman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-01-09vs ALLEX 3.5 18+ W23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Joanie Gold vs Bridget Batzler / Tiffany Anderson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Mary Kennedy
published
3.45
Emily Starita
published
3.42
Carrie Stolar
published 3.5
3.41
Ellen Dobbins
published
3.40
Donnette Tanner
published
3.35
Ruth Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.35
Lori Wehmann
published
3.26
Melodie Marx
published
3.25
Amy Tjornhom
published 3.5
3.24
Maggie Hillmer
published
3.09
Cory Borthwick
published 3.5
3.09
Joanie Gold
published
3.06
Stacy Chillscyzn
published
Kristin von Seggern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Dobbins + Carrie Stolar10259% games+8.4% vs expected
Maggie Hillmer + Melodie Marx191352% games−2.9% vs expected
Joanie Gold + Ellen Dobbins4146% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Dobbins + Ruth Eliason314 matchesnot enough data
Cory Borthwick + Ellen Dobbins033 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Dobbins + Emily Starita213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Kennedy
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Emily Starita
38W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Carrie Stolar
32W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Ellen Dobbins
50W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Donnette Tanner
14W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Ruth Eliason
263W–178L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Lori Wehmann
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
Melodie Marx
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Tjornhom
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Maggie Hillmer
31W–24L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Cory Borthwick
22W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Joanie Gold
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.09
Stacy Chillscyzn
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
Kristin von Seggern
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.