Teams

NITA S 40W18f River Trails (Miller)

2022 NITA3 Summer Adult 18 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.89 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-23vs NITA S 40W18e Rush Copley (Stine)Won 40
W#1 DoublesAnitra Willis / Urszula Farry vs Claire Ralphs / Dorothy OMalley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesColleen Chionis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary McIlwee / Emily Doyle vs Betsy Utterback / Allison Genovese6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDimitrina Schoyer / Tanja Boskovic vs Todra Oken / Tiffany Oken6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-18vs NITA S 40W18a TAM (Farinas)Split 22
L#1 DoublesAna Chang / Alison Miller vs Ali Laumann / Katie Wilson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Doyle vs Rebecca Daly6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesUrszula Farry / Anitra Willis vs Ashley Kaufman / Ashley Boduch6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesApple Naughton / Karen Salter vs Laura Purcell / Yumi Ida1-6
L#1 DoublesAlison Miller / Ana Chang vs Christine Campanelli / Sue Lehrer1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Doyle vs Perry Mimms4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesUrszula Farry / Anitra Willis vs Bela Starkman / Leah Starkman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesZanobia Syed / SANDRA MEJIA vs Anna Dau / Lydia Vaughan2-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesZanobia Syed / Colleen Chionis vs Kelly Good / Janet Wolf5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Miller / Karen Salter vs Laurie Knutte / Marinne Leonard0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesApple Naughton / Mary McIlwee vs Karin Carney / Kerri Sedlacek4-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesZanobia Syed / Karen Salter vs Sylwia Rakauskas / Simona Fojtikova6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAna Chang vs Lisa Parsons6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlison Miller / Apple Naughton vs Angela Ratkovich / Jennifer Gaynor2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary McIlwee / Dimitrina Schoyer vs Amy Tyree / Lynn Zolfo6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA 40W18 Heritage TC (Campanelli/Jurczyk)5118615140
2NITA S 40W18a TAM (Farinas)5115922173
3NITA S 40W18c Score (Bianchi/Knutte)4217719199
4NITA S 40W18g Norris RC (Nagel)3316820152
5NITA S 40W18f River Trails (Miller)33101431224
6NITA S 40W18e Rush Copley (Stine)1561837222
7NITA S 40W18d Oak Lawn RC (Gaynor)0622244264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Emily Doyle
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.03
Ana Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.77
Urszula Farry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Colleen Chionis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Alison Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Anitra Willis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Apple Naughton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Tanja Boskovic
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Dimitrina Schoyer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Tricia Dziabis
published
Karen Salter
published
Katie Calmeyn
published
Mary McIlwee
published
SANDRA MEJIA
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Zanobia Syed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Chang + Emily Doyle24963% games+6.1% vs expected
Colleen Chionis + Anitra Willis2450% games+3.8% vs expected
Tanja Boskovic + Dimitrina Schoyer322452% games+3.2% vs expected
Apple Naughton + Urszula Farry8652% games+1.1% vs expected
Dimitrina Schoyer + Apple Naughton111249% games−1.2% vs expected
Alison Miller + Colleen Chionis102248% games−5.5% vs expected
Anitra Willis + Urszula Farry5352% gamesnot enough data
Alison Miller + Apple Naughton4353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emily Doyle
132W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
4.39
4
Ana Chang
210W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Urszula Farry
85W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Colleen Chionis
180W–187L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Alison Miller
69W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Anitra Willis
88W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Apple Naughton
225W–194L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Tanja Boskovic
194W–136L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Dimitrina Schoyer
286W–188L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Tricia Dziabis
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
Karen Salter
46W–58L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katie Calmeyn
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary McIlwee
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
SANDRA MEJIA
26W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Zanobia Syed
30W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.