Teams

Stewart/Fayetteville/FAC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-26vs Daglow-Anderson/Rogers/SVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesKelly Calvert Stewart vs Abbi Nelson7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMichele Senlikci vs Michelle Kehoe6-3, 6-3
2025-01-06vs Van Schenck/Garfield/KTCWon 20
W#2 SinglesMichele Senlikci vs Courtney Kleinebreil7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKelly Calvert Stewart vs Michelle van Schenck6-4, 7-6
2024-12-17vs Luong/Rogers/SRCLost 03
L#1 SinglesKelly Calvert Stewart vs Brooke Redfern4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichele Senlikci vs Mimi Luong1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSherry Lux vs Haley Maxwell1-6, 1-6
2024-12-09vs Tarnasky/Fayetteville/FACLost 02
L#1 SinglesKelly Calvert Stewart vs Callie Brannon6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCarolina Gomez vs Susan Murray3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-11-19vs Luong/Rogers/SRCLost 02
L#2 SinglesMichele Senlikci vs Brooke Redfern4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesCarolina Gomez vs Emma Savoy2-6, 2-6
2024-11-15vs Schley-Chrenka/Springdale/MRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelly Calvert Stewart vs Kaylee Snell6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKimberly Brooks vs Laurel Schley5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMichele Senlikci vs Tiffany Harris6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Kelly Calvert Stewart
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.41
Kimberly Brooks
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Michele Senlikci
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.89
Sherry Lux
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.82
Carolina Gomez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Lux + Carolina Gomez7163% games+6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Calvert Stewart
15W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Kimberly Brooks
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.41
Michele Senlikci
31W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Sherry Lux
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Carolina Gomez
14W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.