Teams

Daglow-Anderson/Rogers/SVCC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-27vs Schley-Chrenka/Springdale/MRCWon 21
L#1 SinglesShangwen Huang vs Laurel Schley1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPiper Anderson vs Tiffany Harris6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesGabriela Bottger vs Kaylee Snell6-2, 6-2
2025-01-26vs Stewart/Fayetteville/FACLost 02
L#1 SinglesAbbi Nelson vs Kelly Calvert Stewart5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Kehoe vs Michele Senlikci3-6, 3-6
2024-12-03vs Tarnasky/Fayetteville/FACWon 21
W#1 SinglesMichelle Kehoe vs MaryJohn Richmond6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAbbi Nelson vs Robin Wise6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesGabriela Bottger vs Susan Murray6-2, 6-0
2024-11-18vs Luong/Rogers/SRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesPiper Anderson vs Emma Savoy6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLaurie Letts vs Natalie Herold7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesShangwen Huang vs Jamia Weir6-7, 4-6
2024-11-12vs Schley-Chrenka/Springdale/MRCWon 21
L#1 SinglesMichelle Kehoe vs Nur Kamilah Chrenka6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShangwen Huang vs Kaylee Snell4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLaurie Letts vs Tiffany Harris2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-05vs Van Schenck/Garfield/KTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesAbbi Nelson vs Kelsey Sundara5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLaurie Letts vs Michelle van Schenck3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesPiper Anderson vs Madelyn Guido6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Piper Anderson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Michelle Kehoe
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.37
Gabriela Bottger
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.32
Laurie Letts
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.25
Abbi Nelson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Shangwen Huang
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abbi Nelson + Laurie Letts3249% games+11.7% vs expected
Gabriela Bottger + Piper Anderson8358% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Piper Anderson
27W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Michelle Kehoe
31W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Gabriela Bottger
21W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Laurie Letts
35W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Abbi Nelson
16W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Shangwen Huang
13W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.