Teams

SPANISH OAKS

2021 NTA SUMMER LEAGUE · 3.0 WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-08-30vs DTC #1Lost 03
L#1 Female DoublesJulie Schoolmeester / Michelle Strahler vs Doreen Lono / Suzy Wirth2-6, 3-6
L#2 Female DoublesTiffany Rorman / Carla Kuhl vs Moon-Hui Choi / Christine LaBarre2-6, 1-6
L#3 Female DoublesMartha Langer / Lonna Kelly-Ibarra vs Lauren Pena / Gerri Ellis0-6, 0-6
2021-08-23vs SPANISH TRAILLost 13
W#1 Female DoublesJulie Schoolmeester / Eliane Mahlangu vs Shelly Figueredo / Kathleen Richardson7-5, 6-4
L#1 Female SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Tina Nathalia0-6, 2-6
L#2 Female DoublesCarla Kuhl / Kara Moncrief vs Elizabeth Templeton / Merri Stevens0-6, 4-6
L#3 Female DoublesLonna Kelly-Ibarra / Martha Langer vs Nicole Palichat / Nancy Ozun0-6, 1-6
2021-08-16vs CANYON GATELost 03
L#1 Female DoublesJulie Schoolmeester / Eliane Mahlangu vs Maria Lowry / Natasha Kattau7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 Female SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Jill Morrison0-6, 0-6
L#2 Female DoublesMartha Langer / Kara Moncrief vs Athene Garfield / Alex Pinson0-6, 1-6
2021-08-09vs RED ROCK CC #1Lost 03
L#1 Female SinglesJulie Schoolmeester vs Anne Martz1-6, 0-6
L#2 Female DoublesKara Moncrief / Martha Langer vs Travis Azous / Felicia Galati2-6, 0-6
L#3 Female DoublesDeborah Graham / Carla Kuhl vs Jamie O'Connell / Elise OConnell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-08-02vs DTC #3Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesJulie Schoolmeester / Michelle Strahler vs Melissa Ruediger / Holly Highfill5-7, 1-6
L#2 Female DoublesTiffany Rorman / Kara Moncrief vs Diana Stiglic / Beth Burns1-6, 1-6
2021-07-31vs DTC #1Split 22
W#1 Female DoublesTiffany Rorman / Julie Schoolmeester vs Moon-Hui Choi / Ali Wolak7-6, 6-4
L#1 Female SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Monica Taylor4-6, 1-6
L#2 Female DoublesSusan Mulanax / Martha Langer vs Doreen Lono / Christine LaBarre0-6, 0-6
W#3 Female DoublesCarla Kuhl / Deborah Graham vs Yuanhong Du / Lauren Pena6-1, 6-1
2021-07-19vs SPANISH TRAILSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesDeborah Graham / Carla Kuhl vs Cindy Nguyen / Tina Nathalia6-2, 6-2
L#2 Female DoublesMichelle Strahler / Tiffany Rorman vs Kathleen Richardson / Shelly Figueredo2-6, 0-6
2021-07-12vs CANYON GATELost 03
L#1 Female DoublesJulie Schoolmeester / Eliane Mahlangu vs Courtney Casem / Athene Garfield4-6, 2-6
L#1 Female SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Nadine Kluger1-6, 0-6
L#2 Female DoublesCarla Kuhl / Martha Langer vs Natasha Kattau / Jill Morrison2-6, 1-6
2021-07-05vs RED ROCK CC #1Lost 13
L#1 Female DoublesJulie Schoolmeester / Eliane Mahlangu vs Krislyn Millar / Amy Arbeli4-6, 2-6
L#1 Female SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Ashley Steffen0-6, 1-6
W#2 Female DoublesKara Moncrief / Carla Kuhl vs Jamie O'Connell / Elise OConnell6-3, 6-4
L#3 Female DoublesTiffany Rorman / Susan Mulanax vs Anne Martz / Danielle Rusk1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Carla Kuhl
usually #2 Female Doubles 57%, also #3 Female Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Julie Schoolmeester
usually #1 Female Doubles 88%, also #1 Female Singles 13% · published 3
2.61
Deborah Graham
published 3
2.34
Tiffany Rorman
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Michelle Strahler
usually #1 Female Singles 63%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.00
Martha Langer
usually #2 Female Doubles 75%, also #3 Female Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Graham + Carla Kuhl193544% games−2.4% vs expected
Michelle Strahler + Tiffany Rorman2536% games−4.5% vs expected
Julie Schoolmeester + Deborah Graham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carla Kuhl
71W–204L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Julie Schoolmeester
75W–90L career · 8 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Deborah Graham
56W–153L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.61
2.5
Tiffany Rorman
39W–76L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Michelle Strahler
23W–110L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Martha Langer
85W–163L career · 12 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.