Teams

Beeson/Strassell 4.0 Singles 18+ Thurs

2023 Piedmont Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women 18+ Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-20vs Harlan 4.0 Singles 18+ ThursLost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Richardson vs Heather Parr0-6, 0-6
2023-07-06vs Ray 4.0 Singles 18+ ThursLost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Richardson vs Amy Beth Kessinger1-6, 2-6
2023-06-08vs Harlan 4.0 Singles 18+ ThursLost 01
L#2 SinglesErin Richardson vs Jennifer Mays0-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 18+ Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Elizabeth Gill
published 4.5
Cameron Kluttz
published 4.5
3.98
Jordan Hedrick
published
3.95
Sally Eagleton
published
3.81
Michele Alvarino
published
3.76
Sara Strassell
published
3.56
Melissa Beeson
published
3.56
Cj Isner
published 4
3.44
Erin Richardson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Gill
23W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Cameron Kluttz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jordan Hedrick
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%44%
3.98
Sally Eagleton
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
Michele Alvarino
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.81
Sara Strassell
27W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
Melissa Beeson
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Cj Isner
22W–21L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Erin Richardson
92W–116L career · 3 lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.