Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Torres

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-08vs Spanish Fork-CardonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Tooley / Jennifer Wecker vs Robyn Cardon / Christine Gouff6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJan Watts / Dawn Farrell vs Christina Marshall / Shirley Johnson2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJennifer Wecker / Diane Poole vs Karla Block / Michelle Waters6-1, 6-3
2022-07-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJan Watts / Dawn Farrell vs Emma Li / Carrie Larsen4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-07-25vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/RollinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Wecker / Molly Adams vs Jamie Sorensen / Jocelyn Pearson6-2, 6-2
2022-07-18vs Sports Mall-ThompsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wecker / Maria Pettit vs Brenda Green / Paula Gause6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-20vs South Jordan-RoseWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wecker / Jennifer Tooley vs Sara Ray / Katie Rose6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kassie Torres
published 4
3.26
Jennifer Wecker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah Law
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
3.13
Dawn Farrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Diane Poole
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.68
Kate Franko
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Jan Watts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Linda Larsen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Mary Jayne Child
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Molly Adams
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
Sherrie Hatch
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Adams + Kassie Torres7355% games+11.8% vs expected
Sarah Law + Maria Pettit5064% games+8.8% vs expected
Dawn Farrell + Jan Watts2448% games+7.4% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Sherrie Hatch6357% games+7.4% vs expected
Mary Jayne Child + Molly Adams13857% games+5.1% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Sherrie Hatch3650% games+2.4% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Molly Adams4157% games+1.6% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Jennifer Wecker8163% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kassie Torres
180W–119L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
198W–228L career · 19 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Sarah Law
85W–85L career · 20 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Dawn Farrell
127W–112L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Diane Poole
191W–165L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Kate Franko
50W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Jan Watts
15W–53L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Larsen
18W–32L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jayne Child
50W–107L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Adams
83W–53L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherrie Hatch
74W–76L career · 16 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.