Teams

MSIL 7.0 Mixed 40&O Singhal-Bloomington

2022 MSIL Mixed 40 & Over -West League · West MSIL 40 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesCraig Conway / Jan Dickerson vs Tod Nicholls / Shiho Gimbel6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCraig Conway / Jan Dickerson vs Tim Dasenbrock / Laura Boualavong4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCraig Conway / Jan Dickerson vs Robert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRavi Singhal / Lynn Milton vs Patrick Garrity / Sally Boland6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesCraig Conway / Jan Dickerson vs Sean Miller / Janet Hogan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTodd Kettering / Lynn Milton vs Tod Nicholls / Sally Boland1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJan Dickerson / Craig Conway vs Laura Boualavong / Tim Dasenbrock3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJan Dickerson / Craig Conway vs Celeste Ames / Robert Vanhootegem2-6, 6-7
2022-01-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesJan Dickerson / Craig Conway vs Janet Hogan / Sean Miller6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJan Dickerson / Craig Conway vs Celeste Ames / Robert Vanhootegem7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for West MSIL 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lynn Milton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Dusty McEwen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.33
Allison Cooper
published 3.5
3.33
Gregg Mecherle
published 3.5
3.25
Jan Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Craig Conway
published 3.5
3.11
Joseph McCarron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Todd Kettering
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Brady
published
Ravi Singhal
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Shen Dirkes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Dickerson + Craig Conway5360% gamesnot enough data
Dusty McEwen + Joseph McCarron4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lynn Milton
41W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Dusty McEwen
76W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Allison Cooper
54W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Gregg Mecherle
22W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Jan Dickerson
104W–104L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Craig Conway
35W–57L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Joseph McCarron
53W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.11
Todd Kettering
33W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Nancy Brady
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ravi Singhal
34W–34L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shen Dirkes
52W–70L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.