← Search

Shen Dirkes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 62W–96L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history158 matches
L
2026-03-22 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Dickerson
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-22 · MSIL A65&O 6.0W Gregory-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jo Carter
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-10 · MSIL A65&O 6.0W Gregory-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jo Carter
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-15 · MSIL/Doscotch/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawn Doscotch
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-07-10 · MSIL/Doscotch/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Bennett
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige McNamara
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Mangina
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2025-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Soonok Cramer
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Wombacher
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-11-16 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo McNamara-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-16 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo McNamara-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-20 · MSIL 4.5W Fall Tri-Level McNamara-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Lawler
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 57.9% of games
4.0
17.9%
7W–32L · 35.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 62.7% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.4% of games
7.5
38.2%
13W–21L · 48.5% of games
8.0
10%
1W–9L · 34.4% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 38.3% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 34% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 17.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
34 matches
#1 Singles
15%
24 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe