Teams

Hills - HCC Young Guns/J. Schneider

2021 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-11-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesEugen Schwarz / David Voelker vs Gary Zirbel / Richard Warrener6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEugene Martineau / David Voelker vs Wendell Xiao / Doug Angelone4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEugene Martineau / David Voelker vs Wendell Xiao / Doug Angelone6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-09-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesEugene Martineau / David Voelker vs Gary Zirbel / Richard Warrener3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-09-19vs Hunters Green Brigade - E. CollinsLost 01
L#3 DoublesEugene Martineau / Chi Ming Yu vs John Cotey / Michael Dasilva1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Eugen Schwarz
published 4
3.80
Jose Alomar
published
3.76
Eugene Martineau
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Donald Bell
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.65
David Voelker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Javier Espinoza
published
3.41
Ken Chin
published
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
Randy Sterns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eugene Martineau + David Voelker5255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eugen Schwarz
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
Jose Alomar
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Eugene Martineau
57W–46L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Donald Bell
113W–113L career · type S · 7 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Javier Espinoza
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.43
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Randy Sterns
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.