Teams

Redding/White 6.5 Combo 55s Tues

2023 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · Women 6.5 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Michaud / Myra Propst vs Vicki Pearson / Melanie Miller6-2, 6-1
2023-09-05vs COLE 6.5 Combo 55s TuesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Debra Hendricks vs Meghan Flynn / Julia Barnes7-6, 6-2
2023-08-22vs Michaels 6.5 Combo 55s TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesBetsey Wells / Myra Propst vs Vickie Degges / Gayle Taylordean6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-08vs Varner/Davis 6.5 Combo 55s Tues PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetty Haggard / Myra Propst vs Melinda Billings / Britt Flanagan4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.27
Gladys Dunn
published 3.5
3.25
Kathy Chinnis
published
3.19
Betsey Wells
published 3.5
3.13
Debra Hendricks
published 3.5
2.97
Jill Elam
published
2.95
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
2.86
Terri Laughlin
published
2.85
Sue White
published
2.74
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.69
Eleanor Redding
published 3
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Lydia Nadel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue White + Gladys Dunn213 matchesnot enough data
Betsey Wells + Lydia Nadel123 matchesnot enough data
Eleanor Redding + Kathy Chinnis033 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Michaud + Cindy Wood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Michaud
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Gladys Dunn
29W–22L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Kathy Chinnis
17W–33L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Betsey Wells
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Debra Hendricks
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
Jill Elam
19W–31L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–24L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
Terri Laughlin
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Cindy Wood
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Myra Propst
147W–178L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
Lydia Nadel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.