Teams

LLW - Bake - Hitters

2023 SCTA Doubles - Bakersfield · 3.5 Women's-Bake

11 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-19vs Bake - Team HollidayWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Duquette / Kristin Weber vs Erin Black / Marri Tillema6-3, 6-4
2023-10-29vs Bake - Team HollidayWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Duquette / Dianne Benshoof vs Rhonda Slegers / Susan Frakes6-2, 7-5
2023-10-22vs Bake - Queens of the CourtWon 10
W#1 DoublesRochelle Torgusen / Dianne Benshoof vs Hyejung Oh / Crystal Neptune7-5, 7-5
2023-10-15vs Bake - Team HollidaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRochelle Torgusen / Natalie Chene vs Susan Frakes / Rhonda Slegers6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDenise Duquette / Dianne Benshoof vs Linette Holliday / Erin Black3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-10-01vs Bake - Queens of the CourtWon 10
W#2 DoublesDenise Duquette / Dianne Benshoof vs Jeannie Munn / Linh Bui6-4, 6-4
2023-09-17vs Bake - Team HollidayWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Seibly / Denise Duquette vs Marri Tillema / Leah Coughlin6-1, 6-4
2023-09-10vs Bake - Queens of the CourtWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Duquette / Dianne Benshoof vs Rosemarie Galindo / Cheryl Garone7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women's-Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Rochelle Torgusen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Natalie Chene
published
3.48
Denise Duquette
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.44
Marites Idica
published
3.41
Brooke Drake
published 4
3.16
Dianne Benshoof
published 3.5
3.04
Michelle Pisano
published
2.92
Cheyenne Romanini
published 3.5
2.77
Cindy Seibly
published 3
2.76
Minda Owens
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rochelle Torgusen
48W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Natalie Chene
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
4
Denise Duquette
37W–25L career · 8 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Marites Idica
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Brooke Drake
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Cheyanne Antongiovanni
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dianne Benshoof
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Michelle Pisano
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Cheyenne Romanini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Cindy Seibly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.