Teams

Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0

2023 DTA N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

21 players · average NTRP 3.94 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Maribel Alvarez
published
4.02
Meg Lohr
published
3.98
Sarah Sparling
published
3.90
3.89
Paula Brunson
published
3.87
Ann Thornton
published 4
3.84
Bridget Goldman
published 4
3.77
Lola Lott
published
3.77
Christine Rogers
published 4
3.76
Tanya Musick
published
3.75
Jacky Pincoffs
published 4
3.75
Lisa Nammari
published
3.74
Artavia Clayton
published 4
3.71
Jerilynn Fletcher
published
3.68
Jill McGill
published
3.59
Kasey Colvin
published
3.58
Angie Woltjen
published 4
3.57
Heather Neilson
published 4
3.54
Mary Beirute
published
3.52
Sarah Deering
published
Emily Hoppers
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Nammari + Meg Lohr10175% games+18.0% vs expected
Christine Rogers + Tanya Musick10357% games+6.7% vs expected
Tanya Musick + Sarah Sparling8558% games+5.9% vs expected
Christine Rogers + Sarah Sparling4258% games+3.8% vs expected
Lisa Nammari + Ann Thornton5158% gamesnot enough data
Paula Brunson + Jerilynn Fletcher314 matchesnot enough data
Paula Brunson + Bridget Goldman314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Nammari + Bridget Goldman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maribel Alvarez
29W–23L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Meg Lohr
53W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
4.02
Sarah Sparling
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
Sue Lopez de Correia
40W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Paula Brunson
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Ann Thornton
51W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Bridget Goldman
25W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Lola Lott
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christine Rogers
23W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Tanya Musick
30W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Jacky Pincoffs
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Lisa Nammari
36W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Artavia Clayton
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Jerilynn Fletcher
36W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Jill McGill
37W–14L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Kasey Colvin
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Angie Woltjen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Heather Neilson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Mary Beirute
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Sarah Deering
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Emily Hoppers
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.