Teams

Bordelon/18/3.5/WD/BREC

2023 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jeansonne/18/WD/BOC71301026268
2Kozar/18/3.5/WD/UC71281228300
3Bordelon/18/3.5/WD/BREC53241636324
4Sellers/18/3.5/WD/CCLA53241639330
5Bogan/18/3.5/WD/BRCC53241640329
6Loupe/18/3.5/WD/BOC35122861411
7Moody/18/3.5/WD/BREC26142656397
8Johnson/18/3.5/WD/YMCA26112964432
9Labbe/18/3.5/WD/BREC08132757415

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Laura Hottes
published
3.53
Susan Doherty
published
3.35
Lisa Bordelon
published
3.27
Brenda Felps
published 3.5
3.21
Dee Bullock
published 3.5
3.19
Georgette Fontenot
published 3.5
3.13
Kitzia Bordlee
published
3.07
Cynthia Chustz
published 3.5
3.06
Amy Sylvester
published 3.5
3.00
Corey Gaffney
published 3.5
2.99
Sharon Wilkins
published
2.98
Kerri Howard
published
2.80
Keri Teague
published
2.68
Kelly Bauder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Hottes + Susan Doherty23760% games+6.9% vs expected
Lisa Bordelon + Kerri Howard3356% games+3.7% vs expected
Kitzia Bordlee + Georgette Fontenot3249% games−2.2% vs expected
Lisa Bordelon + Brenda Felps5260% games−4.0% vs expected
Sharon Wilkins + Kitzia Bordlee5943% games−6.6% vs expected
Brenda Felps + Georgette Fontenot5548% games−8.5% vs expected
Cynthia Chustz + Kerri Howard2442% games−9.3% vs expected
Amy Sylvester + Kerri Howard1838% games−13.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Hottes
77W–24L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
Susan Doherty
83W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Lisa Bordelon
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Brenda Felps
25W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dee Bullock
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Georgette Fontenot
25W–29L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Kitzia Bordlee
46W–50L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cynthia Chustz
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Amy Sylvester
18W–37L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Corey Gaffney
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Sharon Wilkins
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Kerri Howard
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Keri Teague
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Kelly Bauder
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.