Teams

NWillis (Park Road)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-09vs KCochran (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJane Sickles vs Emily Leyser1-6, 1-6
2024-07-02vs KCochran (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Sandra To6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJane Sickles vs Eryn Ratcliffe3-6, 2-6
2024-06-25vs KCochran (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Kim Cochran4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesPamela Burks vs Amanda Meloni7-6, 6-2
2024-06-18vs KCochran (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Eryn Ratcliffe0-6, 2-6
2024-06-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMonica Erb vs Sarah Schweppe2-6, 1-6
2024-06-04vs KCochran (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJane Sickles vs Kristin Verrill1-6, 5-7
2024-05-28Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMonica Erb vs Sarah Schweppe3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Allyson McKay
published 4.5
4.10
Monica Erb
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.09
Nicole Yudin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Irma Laney
published
3.92
Mary Peterson
published
3.83
Elizabeth McCombs
published
3.79
Nily Willis
published 4
3.72
Jane Sickles
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.53
Pamela Burks
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Sickles + Nily Willis12458% games+7.5% vs expected
Elizabeth McCombs + Nily Willis044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allyson McKay
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Monica Erb
97W–77L career · 7 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Nicole Yudin
48W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
Irma Laney
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
Mary Peterson
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.92
Elizabeth McCombs
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.83
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Jane Sickles
103W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Pamela Burks
207W–133L career · 1 line in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.