Teams

Augustine 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.5 Women Fall Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-17vs Brooks/ACC 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAphton Lang vs Caitlin Brooks6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesFrannie Benfield vs Mary Carol Swajkoski Adams1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKate Augustine vs Mary Carol Swajkoski Adams6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKelen Walker vs Diane Puckett6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSara Adamson vs Caitlin Brooks6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAshley Vartanian vs Ella Simpson1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMichele Gustavsson vs Jennifer Klein1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKate Augustine vs Ginger Ballard6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelen Walker vs Debbie Johnson6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMisty Hilliard vs Jane Forbes Fields6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSara Adamson vs Mary Carol Swajkoski Adams6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKelen Walker vs Jennifer Klein6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesFrannie Benfield vs Ella Simpson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMisty Hilliard vs Ginger Ballard6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLondon Kern vs Jennifer Klein2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAshley Vartanian vs Debbie Johnson6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSara Adamson vs Caitlin Brooks6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAphton Lang vs Ginger Ballard3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMichele Gustavsson vs Jane Forbes Fields5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKelen Walker vs Ginger Ballard6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesFrannie Benfield vs Mary Carol Swajkoski Adams3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAshley Vartanian vs Debbie Johnson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kate Augustine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Kelen Walker
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.29
Aphton Lang
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Sara Adamson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.13
London Kern
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Ashley Vartanian
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.08
Frannie Benfield
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.01
Misty Hilliard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.76
Michele Gustavsson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelen Walker + Misty Hilliard2348% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Augustine
44W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Kelen Walker
32W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Aphton Lang
23W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Sara Adamson
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
London Kern
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Ashley Vartanian
33W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Frannie Benfield
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Misty Hilliard
34W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Michele Gustavsson
14W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.