Teams

Richards/Memphis

2024 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 3.5 Mixed 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-06-30vs Podesta/MemphisWon 10
W#3 DoublesSandra Richards / Alfredo Ale vs Kristen Griffith / John Russell6-3, 6-1
2024-06-24vs Thomas/MemphisWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeffery Suber / Sandra Richards vs David Johnson / Zakiya Kelley7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Grace Bann
published 3.5
3.27
Ted Lapina
published
3.25
Sophia Manshack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Sophia Garrison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
John Manshack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Ann Marie Wallace
published 3.5
3.01
Constance Dyson
published 3.5
3.00
Ryan Coopwood
published
2.97
Kruger Peoples
published
2.94
Alex Jankov
published 3
2.86
Tarshian Moon
published
2.74
Cepada Ransfer
published 3
2.71
Sandra Richards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Cheryl Body
published 3
Lloyd Nesbitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Marie Wallace + Kruger Peoples1442% games−9.5% vs expected
John Manshack + Sophia Manshack9262% gamesnot enough data
Grace Bann + Ryan Coopwood6058% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Body + Lloyd Nesbitt1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Grace Bann
50W–51L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
Ted Lapina
32W–33L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Sophia Manshack
27W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Sophia Garrison
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
John Manshack
68W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.12
3.5
Ann Marie Wallace
5W–16L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Constance Dyson
6W–31L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
Ryan Coopwood
40W–44L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.00
Kruger Peoples
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Alex Jankov
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
Tarshian Moon
51W–51L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Cepada Ransfer
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Sandra Richards
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.71
3
Cheryl Body
18W–54L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Lloyd Nesbitt
3W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.