Teams

Beerman Simply Smashing - T. Love

2023 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Rosa Jean vs Tracey Ritter / Ruth Koiner6-2, 6-3
2023-03-21vs Polk/L. Mason/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Julie Goodwin vs Jennifer Burns / Brittany Ward2-6, 1-6
2023-02-14vs LCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Rosa Jean vs Shannon Miles / Sheryl Norman3-6, 0-6
2023-02-07vs Beerman - R. EspitiaLost 01
L#2 DoublesRosalinda Collins / Rosa Jean vs Ginger Davis / Regina Espitia2-6, 0-6
2023-01-24vs Polk/L. Mason/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Tina Marcewicz vs Lauren Mason / Courtney McCrystal5-7, 3-6
2023-01-10vs Beerman - R. CoultonLost 01
L#3 DoublesRosa Jean / Julie Goodwin vs Julie Hartline / Kristi McCarter3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Tiffany Choe
published
3.47
Tiffany Love
published
3.17
Leslie Simmons
published
3.07
Brandye Pickering
published 3.5
2.86
Tina Marcewicz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Courtney Philpot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Julie Goodwin
published
2.54
Stacey McCastlain
published
2.51
Rosalinda Collins
published
2.37
Rosa Jean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Delgado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Simmons + Tiffany Love10461% games+9.5% vs expected
Courtney Philpot + Tina Marcewicz192249% gamesnot enough data
Rosa Jean + Tina Marcewicz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Choe
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
Tiffany Love
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Leslie Simmons
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Brandye Pickering
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Tina Marcewicz
110W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Courtney Philpot
79W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Julie Goodwin
6W–21L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
Stacey McCastlain
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
Rosalinda Collins
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Rosa Jean
28W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.37
Wendy Delgado
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.