Teams

CDTA S A18W4.5 3Schaumburg Wright Sat 3 $20

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

20 players · average NTRP 4.42 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesAmanda Connell / Lilliam Dockal vs Christine Campanelli / Desiree Witte6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesAyano Nakamura / Mary Therese Lee vs Olga Ovnanyan / Elaine Ni5-7, 4-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHeather Mixon vs Allison Solberg6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesSelenay Heper / Randi Wind vs Melanie Berends / Megan Crowley Linne7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTaya Zoubareva / Amanda Connell vs Jackie Ciotti / Keara Miller7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesHeather Mixon vs J'Ana Diamond6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Lee / Ayano Nakamura vs Bella Sirpilla / Susan Klumpner6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesLilliam Dockal / Randi Wind vs Rachel Corrough / Cathy Packer6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHeather Mixon vs Ayah Kamel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJena Lindstrom / Shana Cal vs Linda Wright / Marinne Leonard6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSonal Matta / Corinn Hanson vs Cindy Bielik / Ann Ko6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesTaya Zoubareva / Sonal Matta vs Kim Richards / Diedre Dunn6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAyano Nakamura / Mary Therese Lee vs Sue DeMari / Jessica Wagner6-4, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W4.5 3Schaumburg Wright Sat 3 $20502238137
2CDTA S A18W4.5 5Naperville Richards Wed 7 $2432151023200
3CDTA S A18W4.5 1Centennial Miller Fri 7 $2032141123190
4CDTA S A18W4.5 6Score Kamel Sat 9 $2023101533232
5CDTA S A18W4.5 2Centennial Burns Sun 3 $201481737244
6CDTA S A18W4.5 4MT Bann (OUT) Fishleder Wed 6:30 $271461938252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Taya Zoubareva
published 4.5
4.53
Heather Mixon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.42
Marialin Lomongo
published 4.5
4.41
Ayano Nakamura
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.40
Amanda Connell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Claire Buehler
published 4.5
4.34
Randi Wind
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Mary DaVanti
published 4.5
4.31
Mary Therese Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.25
Isabella Bjerkan
published 4.5
4.25
Alexandra Zoubareva
published 4.5
4.24
Chica Ida
published 4.5
4.22
Corinn Hanson
published 4.5
4.18
Michelle Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Shana Cal
published 4.5
Jena Lindstrom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lilliam Dockal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Selenay Heper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sonal Matta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Buehler + Jena Lindstrom7161% games+12.8% vs expected
Amanda Connell + Taya Zoubareva7069% games+8.8% vs expected
Corinn Hanson + Taya Zoubareva141253% games+8.6% vs expected
Mary Therese Lee + Chica Ida12356% games+4.4% vs expected
Chica Ida + Ayano Nakamura6263% games+4.1% vs expected
Amanda Connell + Ayano Nakamura14162% games+3.2% vs expected
Marialin Lomongo + Chica Ida21460% games+2.8% vs expected
Mary Therese Lee + Michelle Lee7459% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Taya Zoubareva
125W–60L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.59
4.5
Heather Mixon
49W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.53
4.5
Marialin Lomongo
324W–137L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Ayano Nakamura
331W–128L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Amanda Connell
102W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Claire Buehler
115W–77L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
4.36
Randi Wind
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Mary DaVanti
120W–54L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.33
Mary Therese Lee
212W–126L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Isabella Bjerkan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Alexandra Zoubareva
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Chica Ida
281W–105L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Corinn Hanson
120W–54L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
Michelle Lee
167W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Shana Cal
163W–131L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
3.5
Fra Angelica Farinas- Wright
70W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jena Lindstrom
46W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lilliam Dockal
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Selenay Heper
21W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sonal Matta
18W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.