Teams

CDTA S A18W4.5 4MT Bann (OUT) Fishleder Wed 6:30 $27

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

17 players · average NTRP 4.25 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 SinglesEllen Phillips vs Chica Ida4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPerry Mimms / Kristin Mathews vs Shana Cal / Mary DaVanti6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEllen Phillips vs Emily Singh2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Shamrock / Kristin Mathews vs Heike Spahn / Olga Ovnanyan6-7, 2-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKristin Mathews / Anna Dau vs Kim Richards / Leslie McClure6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEllen Phillips vs Miranda Rodriguez2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W4.5 3Schaumburg Wright Sat 3 $20502238137
2CDTA S A18W4.5 5Naperville Richards Wed 7 $2432151023200
3CDTA S A18W4.5 1Centennial Miller Fri 7 $2032141123190
4CDTA S A18W4.5 6Score Kamel Sat 9 $2023101533232
5CDTA S A18W4.5 2Centennial Burns Sun 3 $201481737244
6CDTA S A18W4.5 4MT Bann (OUT) Fishleder Wed 6:30 $271461938252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Amanda Fishleder
published 5
4.27
4.27
Emily Shamrock
published 4.5
4.19
Sheryl Albert
published 4.5
4.09
Perry Mimms
published 4.5
3.99
Anna Dau
published 4
3.98
Iva Gregorova
published 4
3.96
Desiree Witte
published 4
3.93
Ellen Phillips
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.92
Cara Waddle
published 4
3.79
Bela Starkman
published 4
3.74
Sheila Bondoc
published 4
3.55
Kristin Mathews
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Rosen
published
Peter Shields
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Yupin Lerner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Dau + Bela Starkman4357% games+12.5% vs expected
Desiree Witte + Anna Dau5257% games+10.7% vs expected
Sheila Bondoc + Desiree Witte23961% games+6.1% vs expected
Heather Vishnubhakat + Anna Dau11360% games+4.6% vs expected
Sheryl Albert + Desiree Witte4352% games+3.8% vs expected
Anna Dau + Perry Mimms5259% games+3.7% vs expected
Bela Starkman + Perry Mimms2549% games+2.1% vs expected
Cara Waddle + Bela Starkman5848% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Fishleder
79W–30L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.42
4.5
Christine Campanelli
287W–133L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Emily Shamrock
123W–81L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Sheryl Albert
106W–81L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Perry Mimms
120W–59L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
4
Anna Dau
206W–99L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Iva Gregorova
66W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.98
4
Desiree Witte
254W–183L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Ellen Phillips
26W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.93
4
Cara Waddle
150W–116L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Bela Starkman
176W–159L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Sheila Bondoc
106W–61L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Heather Vishnubhakat
120W–94L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kristin Mathews
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Rosen
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Shields
121W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yupin Lerner
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.