Teams

CDTA S A18W4.5 5Naperville Richards Wed 7 $24

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

15 players · average NTRP 4.44 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#3 DoublesSusan Thornquist / Sharon Trager vs Hoda Elshakankery / Linda Wright3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMiranda Rodriguez vs Jennifer Goldfarb6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer McClelland / Kim Richards vs Erin Alvarez / Heike Spahn6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMiranda Rodriguez vs Ellen Phillips6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesJennifer McClelland / Miranda Rodriguez vs Jackie Ciotti / Susan Klumpner6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarole Wittemann / Lisa Lesko vs Alice Copland / Bella Sirpilla6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Thornquist / Sharon Trager vs Claire Buehler / Mary DaVanti0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W4.5 3Schaumburg Wright Sat 3 $20502238137
2CDTA S A18W4.5 5Naperville Richards Wed 7 $2432151023200
3CDTA S A18W4.5 1Centennial Miller Fri 7 $2032141123190
4CDTA S A18W4.5 6Score Kamel Sat 9 $2023101533232
5CDTA S A18W4.5 2Centennial Burns Sun 3 $201481737244
6CDTA S A18W4.5 4MT Bann (OUT) Fishleder Wed 6:30 $271461938252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Carole Wittemann
published 4.5
4.48
Jennifer McClelland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.36
Miranda Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Grace Hahn
published 4.5
4.23
Lisa Musgrave
published 4.5
4.20
Jessica Grizzell
published 4.5
4.06
Sharon Trager
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Diedre Dunn
published 4.5
4.02
Soraya McTeague
published 4.5
4.00
Sue DeMari
published 4.5
3.87
Susan Thornquist
published 4
Jessica Wagner
published
Kim Richards
published
Leslie McClure
published
Lisa Lesko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Musgrave + Diedre Dunn17763% games+8.2% vs expected
Leslie McClure + Soraya McTeague281755% games+4.9% vs expected
Sue DeMari + Kim Richards6258% games+1.4% vs expected
Lisa Lesko + Susan Thornquist81148% games−2.1% vs expected
Susan Thornquist + Diedre Dunn5742% games−12.6% vs expected
Lisa Musgrave + Miranda Rodriguez5559% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Lesko + Diedre Dunn2344% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer McClelland + Jessica Grizzell4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carole Wittemann
84W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.50
Jennifer McClelland
108W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
4.48
Miranda Rodriguez
93W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Grace Hahn
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Lisa Musgrave
202W–113L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Jessica Grizzell
86W–57L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Sharon Trager
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
Diedre Dunn
99W–82L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Soraya McTeague
162W–103L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.02
4.5
Sue DeMari
50W–57L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Susan Thornquist
52W–81L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
Jessica Wagner
28W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Richards
40W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie McClure
37W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Lesko
51W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.