Teams

CDTA S A18W4.5 2Centennial Burns Sun 3 $20

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

19 players · average NTRP 4.40 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 SinglesJill Siegel vs Alexandra Lichtor6-4, 4-5
L#2 SinglesErin Kramer vs Laura Levin5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Ellsworth / Laurie Seward vs Isabel Quinones / Ana Chang6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Goldfarb vs Miranda Rodriguez1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEileen Lee / Laurie Seward vs Soraya McTeague / Leslie McClure6-7, 0-3
W#1 DoublesErin Alvarez / Jill Siegel vs Christine Campanelli / Bela Starkman6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmily Singh vs Ellen Phillips6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAllison Solberg vs Desiree Witte6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAllison Solberg vs Heather Mixon2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Singh vs Alexandra Zoubareva6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Seward / Colette Gramins vs Mary DaVanti / Corinn Hanson2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Goldfarb / Erin Kramer vs Cathy Packer / Susan DiMagno6-7, 2-3
W#1 SinglesEmily Singh vs Ayah Kamel7-6, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJill Siegel vs Rachel Corrough6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18W4.5 3Schaumburg Wright Sat 3 $20502238137
2CDTA S A18W4.5 5Naperville Richards Wed 7 $2432151023200
3CDTA S A18W4.5 1Centennial Miller Fri 7 $2032141123190
4CDTA S A18W4.5 6Score Kamel Sat 9 $2023101533232
5CDTA S A18W4.5 2Centennial Burns Sun 3 $201481737244
6CDTA S A18W4.5 4MT Bann (OUT) Fishleder Wed 6:30 $271461938252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Jennifer Goldfarb
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.37
Elaine Ni
published 4.5
4.36
Erin Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Colette Gramins
published 4.5
4.36
Allison Solberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Emily Singh
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Erin Alvarez
published 4.5
4.24
Olga Ovnanyan
published 4.5
4.20
4.20
Chandana Namburi
published 4.5
4.14
Heike Spahn
published 4.5
4.09
Michele Ihlanfeldt
published
4.08
Jill Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.04
Kerry Nowicki
published 4.5
3.94
Laurie Seward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Amanda Ellsworth
published 4.5
Elizabeth Burns
published 4
3.69
Eileen Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Amy Antoniolli
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Ni + Heike Spahn7262% games+10.8% vs expected
Janet Rauschenberger + Chandana Namburi4256% games+8.5% vs expected
Amanda Ellsworth + Heike Spahn6457% games+2.1% vs expected
Heike Spahn + Kerry Nowicki3651% games+2.0% vs expected
Heike Spahn + Laurie Seward4549% games+0.9% vs expected
Elaine Ni + Janet Rauschenberger4648% games−0.0% vs expected
Heike Spahn + Elizabeth Burns3750% games−0.8% vs expected
Heike Spahn + Janet Rauschenberger5452% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Goldfarb
61W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Elaine Ni
61W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
4.37
4.5
Erin Kramer
63W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Colette Gramins
70W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Allison Solberg
30W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Emily Singh
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Erin Alvarez
45W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Olga Ovnanyan
54W–31L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Janet Rauschenberger
48W–39L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Chandana Namburi
64W–47L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Heike Spahn
168W–151L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
Michele Ihlanfeldt
93W–117L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Jill Siegel
84W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Kerry Nowicki
94W–111L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
Laurie Seward
42W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.94
4.5
Amanda Ellsworth
47W–69L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Elizabeth Burns
34W–41L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Eileen Lee
136W–123L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Amy Antoniolli
33W–44L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.