Teams

Byrd, Adam

2025 Mixed 18 & Over-JXN · 3.5 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-21vs Bailey, BenLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrad Youngblood / Emma Bond vs Julie Barry / Jason Griffin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Byrd / Jackson Ikerd vs Mandalin Blanton / Beau Brady6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Byrd / Ashley Howell vs Heather Bailey / Andrew Stubbs6-4, 6-4
2025-07-07vs Sykes, JoannaLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrad Youngblood / Emma Bond vs Stacey Sykes / Sadie Pullen6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKatherine Byrd / Chad Myers vs Blake Kennedy / Sara Pullen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Howell / Daniel Benefield vs Nealie Cooper / Matt Carpenter4-6, 3-6
2025-06-30vs Adams, AmberWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Howell / Jonathan Sims vs David Adams / Amber Mullin6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdam Byrd / Emma Bond vs Meredith Boston / Steven Gentry6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBradley Fulton / Janice Fulton vs Lisa Little / Jay Irving6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-16vs Alexander, TerraSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Byrd / Katherine Byrd vs Carla Rushing / Julio Morales6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Miller / Brad Youngblood vs Ray Jost / Terra Alexander6-0, 6-0
2025-06-09vs Smith, AutumnWon 30
W#1 DoublesBradley Fulton / Katherine Byrd vs Autumn Smith / Parker Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrad Youngblood / Janice Fulton vs Preston SMITH / Claire Ewing6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJordan Miller / Emma Bond vs Jason Hampton / Geri Smith6-2, 6-1
2025-06-02vs Dutta, SouravWon 21
L#1 DoublesJonathan Sims / Ashley Howell vs Laura McMahon / Vladimir Abril3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Byrd / Erin Dehon vs Sourav Dutta / Stacey Coulter6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Miller / Daniel Benefield vs Reuben Harvey / Cameron Trussell6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-26vs Pace, PhillipWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Youngblood / Katie Miller vs Mitch Stentiford / Monique Kelly6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Dehon / Chad Myers vs Phillip Pace / Brooke Alvis6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAdam Byrd / Janice Fulton vs Elizabeth Randall / Abram Diaz6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Ward, DarrellWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Youngblood / Erin Dehon vs John Patton / Tempestt Gilmore7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDaniel Benefield / Katie Miller vs Darrell Ward / Deborah McGehee6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJackson Ikerd / Katherine Byrd vs Dante Grant / Karley Newell6-1, 6-4
2025-05-05vs Guthrie, HarperWon 20
W#1 DoublesJonathan Sims / Ashley Howell vs Christian Medina / Mary Kate Diltz6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDaniel Benefield / Emma Bond vs Natalie Howell / Joseph Guthrie6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bailey, Ben8121617190
2Byrd, Adam7220717194
3Dutta, Sourav5316820196
4Ward, Darrell44101429214
5Guthrie, Harper2791839262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Adam Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Jackson Ikerd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Brad Youngblood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Chad Myers
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.29
Daniel Benefield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Emma Bond
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Jonathan Sims
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Erin Dehon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Katherine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.09
Bradley Fulton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Janice Fulton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Fulton + Bradley Fulton314 matchesnot enough data
Emma Bond + Adam Byrd213 matchesnot enough data
Emma Bond + Brad Youngblood213 matchesnot enough data
Brad Youngblood + Katherine Byrd213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adam Byrd
47W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jackson Ikerd
19W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
3.5
Brad Youngblood
26W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Chad Myers
42W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Daniel Benefield
19W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Emma Bond
33W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jonathan Sims
38W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Erin Dehon
25W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Katherine Byrd
22W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Bradley Fulton
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Janice Fulton
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.