Teams

LCTA40/Grimm /LTP-DI

USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-15vs LCTA40/Houser/MPRLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathryn Diminich / Brian Johnson vs Dennis Rossello / Kimberley Buck6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-01vs LCTA40/Howle/MPRLost 01
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Young / Brian Johnson vs Nicole Boss / Justin Moses3-6, 5-7
2023-05-31vs LCTA40/Garrett/DWWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathryn Diminich / Brian Johnson vs Paige Hall / Geoffrey Martin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-04vs LCTA40/Balcer/MPRWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Amy Etheridge vs Lori Cameron / Matt Marshall6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Annmarie Taggio
published 4
3.71
Neil Shannon
published
3.67
Nima Moghadam
published
3.64
Kirsten Lanphear
published
3.63
Evelyn Young
published
3.61
Kathryn Diminich
published
3.55
Keith Pridgen
published
3.52
Peter Brechtel
published
3.45
Mary Turbeville
published
3.35
Deana Cumbie
published 3.5
3.32
Katie Buss
published
3.26
Erin Grimm
published
3.26
Brian Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Amy Etheridge
published 3.5
3.13
Dana Cumbie
published 3.5
3.01
Bruce Etheridge
published 3
2.81
David Lanphear
published 3
2.70
Leah Surles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Etheridge + Bruce Etheridge1444% games−3.1% vs expected
Deana Cumbie + Dana Cumbie033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annmarie Taggio
74W–70L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Neil Shannon
40W–31L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Nima Moghadam
50W–55L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Kirsten Lanphear
54W–41L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Evelyn Young
55W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.63
Kathryn Diminich
63W–36L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Keith Pridgen
102W–100L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Peter Brechtel
79W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.52
Mary Turbeville
36W–20L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Deana Cumbie
55W–75L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Katie Buss
65W–42L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Erin Grimm
51W–54L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Brian Johnson
128W–179L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Etheridge
23W–37L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dana Cumbie
46W–52L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Bruce Etheridge
89W–52L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
David Lanphear
84W–62L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Leah Surles
32W–29L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.