Teams

Billings - DAZE Dbls 3.5 Mon PM

2024 Summer Daze Doubles · 3.5 Mon PM Summer Daze

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesAmy Kemp / Emily Wilson vs Donna Esson / Cynthia Beck6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Olson / Laura Wallace vs Stephanie Barnard / Brooke Tsuei6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnetta Bartle / Laura Wallace vs Carol Poling / Cynthia Beck2-6, 1-6
2024-06-24vs Dulin - DAZE Dbls 3.5 Mon PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Mary Winstead vs Melissa Gujrati / Robin Crosier6-2, 7-5
2024-06-17vs Davis - DAZE Dbls 3.5 Mon PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Olson / Laura Wallace vs Caroline DeVillers / Cheryl Rankin6-1, 6-3
2024-06-03vs Dulin - DAZE Dbls 3.5 Mon PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnetta Bartle / Emily Wilson vs Aimee Largen / Tesha Whaley2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mon PM Summer Daze have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Lauran Epstein
published
3.32
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.30
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.08
Meghan Hilleboe
published
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Mary Winstead
published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
published 3
2.91
Laura Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Amy Kemp
published 3
2.84
Annetta Bartle
published 3
2.77
Gail Terrell
published
Melinda Billings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annetta Bartle + Lauran Epstein224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Winstead + Lauran Epstein033 matchesnot enough data
Annetta Bartle + Gail Terrell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauran Epstein
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Reeves Rhoten
30W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Meghan Hilleboe
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 3 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Winstead
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Laura Wallace
47W–73L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Amy Kemp
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Gail Terrell
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Melinda Billings
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.