Teams

EW-PC-Hedbon

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-26vs EW-YTC-LybeckWon 20
W#1 DoublesRikki West / Tiffany Hebdon vs Rose Longoria / Molly Neal6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Duncan / Shaelah Harmon vs Dana Lybeck / Erika Mullins6-1, 6-1
2023-02-26vs WCCP-SchnurmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMauri Morgan / Shaelah Harmon vs Anne Schnurman / Sarah Donahue6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJaelynne King vs Alissa Long6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTina Duncan / Susan Duncan vs ARLENE CUSTER / Debi Herbst6-1, 6-3
2023-02-25vs EW-YTC-LybeckWon 21
W#1 DoublesMauri Morgan / Shaelah Harmon vs Dana Lybeck / Erika Mullins6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesRikki West vs Jennifer Terami7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTina Duncan / Susan Duncan vs Molly Neal / Rose Longoria1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-02-25vs WCCP-SchnurmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMauri Morgan / Rikki West vs ARLENE CUSTER / Alissa Long6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTiffany Hebdon vs Debi Herbst6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShaelah Harmon / Susan Duncan vs Anne Schnurman / Kathi Plager6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Hedbon40102460
2EW-YTC-Lybeck13661382
3WCCP-Schnurman1321021138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Shaelah Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.01
Mauri Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.95
Tina Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.92
Rikki West
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.84
Jaelynne King
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.82
Tiffany Hebdon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rikki West + Shaelah Harmon10168% games+15.8% vs expected
Mauri Morgan + Shaelah Harmon10359% games+8.2% vs expected
Mauri Morgan + Tina Duncan11262% games+6.9% vs expected
Tiffany Hebdon + Tina Duncan314 matchesnot enough data
Rikki West + Tina Duncan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shaelah Harmon
38W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Mauri Morgan
39W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Tina Duncan
48W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Rikki West
45W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jaelynne King
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Tiffany Hebdon
20W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.