BT-Watson 40&O 70 Mix F

2026 aSEM MIX WINTER 40 & OVER · 2026 70 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F

20 players · average NTRP 3.53 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule7 played

2026-04-18vs TROY-Vondell 40&O 70 Mix FLost 0–1

L#2 DoublesMarji Litwin / Iain Levy vs Ewa Pluszczyk / Rick Mida2-6, 1-6

2026-04-12vs SCWB-Tagawa 40&O 70 Mix FSplit 1–1

W#1 DoublesTammy Watson / Christopher Marshall vs Madhu Dayananthan / Yasuko Tagawa6-4, 6-1

L#3 DoublesMatthew Katz / Mary Williams vs Rebecca Paskaramoorthy / Yoshihiro Omori2-6, 1-6

2026-03-22vs FAC-Stieber 40&O 70 Mix FLost 0–1

L#3 DoublesChristopher Marshall / Celina Foskett vs Rebecca Barry / Brian Toggweiler6-3, 3-6, 0-1

2026-03-07vs FAC-Ross 40&O 70 Mix FWon 1–0

W#3 DoublesLynn Bechtel / Christopher Marshall vs Meredith Tipton / Francesco Adamopoulos6-4, 6-3

2026-03-01vs SCWB-Tagawa 40&O 70 Mix FSplit 1–1

L#1 DoublesMatthew Katz / Mary Williams vs Yasuko Tagawa / Madhu Dayananthan3-6, 4-6

W#3 DoublesChristopher Marshall / Lilian Strasser vs Shannon Matuska / Douglas Ostermann6-3, 6-1

2026-02-15vs FAC-Stieber 40&O 70 Mix FLost 0–2

L#1 DoublesJason Stadtherr / Tammy Watson vs Brad Stieber / Birgit Sorgenfrei1-6, 2-6

L#2 DoublesIain Levy / Celina Foskett vs Brian Toggweiler / Julie Boike2-6, 6-7

2026-02-07vs TROY-Vondell 40&O 70 Mix FLost 0–1

L#1 DoublesAnthony Spagnoli / Tammy Watson vs Preetham Chandrasekhar / Sara Van Wormer6-3, 2-6, 0-1

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings19 teams · 2026 70 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1LIB-Marley 40&O 70 Mix F	8	4	23	13	32	304
2EAST-Thomas 40&0 70 Mix F	8	4	22	14	35	314
3WESS-Brown 40&O 70 Mix F	7	1	20	4	13	159
4LIB-Katakowski 40&O 70 Mix F	7	5	20	16	37	317
5HV-King 40&O Mix F	7	5	18	18	43	342
6TROY-Vondell 40&O 70 Mix F	6	2	16	8	18	191
7FAC-Stieber 40&O 70 Mix F	6	2	16	8	20	204
8PH-Davies 40&O 70 Mix F	6	6	18	18	39	330
9PEACH-Gaines 40&O 70 Mix F	6	6	16	20	46	359
10SCWB-Smith 40&O 70 Mix	4	4	12	12	26	219
11TROY-Li 40&O 70 Mix F	4	4	12	12	26	231
12SCWB-Gay 40&O 70 Mix F	4	4	10	14	30	231
13EAST-Zampardo 40&O 70 Mix	4	8	16	20	45	360
14SCWB-Tagawa 40&O 70 Mix F	3	5	10	14	32	248
15FAC-Ross 40&O 70 Mix F	3	5	8	16	37	261
16BT-Watson 40&O 70 Mix F	2	6	10	14	29	233
17HV-Bieniek 40&O 70 Mix F	2	10	11	25	55	385
18LT-Anderson 40&0 70 Mix F	1	7	6	18	39	267
19DEER-Bjoern 40&O 70 Mix F	0	0	0	0	0	0

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67

Myrna Harbar

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.56

Anthony Spagnoli

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.46

Emily Dawson

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.44

Tammy Watson

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

3.44

Michael Sarafa

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.28

Vick Kheny

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.26

Roopa Gurm

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.25

Lynn Bechtel

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.24

Christopher Marshall

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.21

Jason Stadtherr

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.21

Lilian Strasser

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.20

Kristi Klungness

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.20

Stacey Gutowsky

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.15

Patrick Partyka

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.13

Celina Foskett

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.01

Iain Levy

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

2.95

Marji Litwin

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

2.83

Matthew Katz

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Kevin Agrest

published —

—

Mary Williams

published —

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Myrna Harbar

115W–113L career · 1 line in 2026

11%88%1%

3.67

3.5

Anthony Spagnoli

56W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%33%67%

3.56

3.5

Emily Dawson

89W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%60%40%

3.46

—

Tammy Watson

144W–108L career · 3 lines in 2026

<1%66%34%

3.44

3.5

Michael Sarafa

18W–24L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026

<1%67%33%

3.44

3.5

Vick Kheny

39W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026

2%92%5%

3.28

3.5

Roopa Gurm

111W–105L career · 2 lines in 2026

3%92%4%

3.26

3.5

Lynn Bechtel

87W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026

4%93%4%

3.25

3.5

Christopher Marshall

14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026

4%93%3%

3.24

3.5

Jason Stadtherr

54W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026

6%92%2%

3.21

3.5

Lilian Strasser

90W–102L career · 2 lines in 2026

6%92%2%

3.21

3.5

Kristi Klungness

40W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026

7%91%2%

3.20

3.5

Stacey Gutowsky

82W–107L career · 2 lines in 2026

8%91%2%

3.20

3.5

Patrick Partyka

33W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026

15%85%1%

3.15

3.5

Celina Foskett

35W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026

18%82%<1%

3.13

—

Iain Levy

19W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026

48%52%<1%

3.01

3.5

Marji Litwin

110W–128L career · 3 lines in 2026

63%37%<1%

2.95

—

Matthew Katz

26W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026

1%87%12%

2.83

—

Kevin Agrest

78W–70L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mary Williams

58W–41L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.