Teams

V - LLW ArroyoVistaAnglesandAlleys-W Schoenburg

2022 USTA Adult 18 &Over - WD Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
Humaira Imran
published 5
4.19
Stella Ko
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Nahed Stefany
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.83
Sandy Hutchins
published
3.72
Debra Blackwell-Schrag
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Nancy Pierson
published
3.69
Suzie Yamamoto
published
3.69
Julie Perron
published
3.66
Robyn van Dewark
published
3.63
Jill Koenig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Mary Manix
published
3.50
Karen Rosenberg
published
3.45
Denise Modglin
published 4
3.39
Cheri Ackermann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Stefanie Wah
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Juliet Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Wendy Schoenburg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Schoenburg + Cheri Ackermann402254% games−0.6% vs expected
Wendy Schoenburg + Stefanie Wah8758% gamesnot enough data
Nahed Stefany + Debra Blackwell-Schrag11264% gamesnot enough data
Cheri Ackermann + Stefanie Wah224 matchesnot enough data
Nahed Stefany + Stella Ko303 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Hutchins + Juliet Walsh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Humaira Imran
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.69
4.5
Stella Ko
85W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Nahed Stefany
267W–157L career · 5 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Sandy Hutchins
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Debra Blackwell-Schrag
143W–98L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Nancy Pierson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Suzie Yamamoto
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Julie Perron
10W–22L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Robyn van Dewark
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Jill Koenig
97W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Mary Manix
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Karen Rosenberg
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Denise Modglin
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Cheri Ackermann
132W–87L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Stefanie Wah
149W–129L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Juliet Walsh
51W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Wendy Schoenburg
200W–104L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.